Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So is the senate going to propose that oabmna inavde pakistan to get bin laden. he as 18 months moreonthsd top get him and has wasted 11 already.Its atraction form what is happening with this administration really. Turned thje subjct to bush and ignore your own worsen fails to keep the liberals hating bush insated of what Obam,a promised but can't deliver.
I have read and laughed and giggled my way through this thread and find it hard to understand that the very part of the NY Times article that joejitsu provided had too much of the answer. Read these words with a couple of my emphasizing things and the obvious answer is right there before everybody, even old joe.
The committee report, prepared at the request of Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the committee’s Democratic chairman, concludes unequivocally that in mid-December 2001, Mr. bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, were at the cave complex, where Mr. bin Laden had operated previously during the fight against Soviet forces.
The new report suggests that a larger troop commitment to Afghanistan might have resulted in the demise not only of Mr. bin Laden and his deputy but also of Mullah Muhammad Omar, the leader of the Afghan Taliban. Mullah Omar, who also fled to Pakistan in 2001, has overseen the resurgence of the Taliban.
Why is it that people don't understand key words like, might, in context with the words around them? Might is so key in that sentence and nobody mentioned it, at all.
If the dog hadn't stopped to crap he would have won the race, but dogs being dogs he did stop as they all do at a time like that.
<snipped>Why is it that people don't understand key words like, might, in context with the words around them? Might is so key in that sentence and nobody mentioned it, at all.
Good question 'oldboy, why don't you ask it of your own ilk when they do the same thing? For instance when someone posts the word "liar" in a thread title when it should have been "misspoke"?
Good question 'oldboy, why don't you ask it of your own ilk when they do the same thing? For instance when someone posts the word "liar" in a thread title when it should have been "misspoke"?
Naw, that is not nice to do. I try to keep away from calling anyone, even a lefty, liar. Since I don't do it I don't see the need to call others out for it.
That word might had nothing to do with being a llar or not being one. Therefore, I don't see that I wronged either the writer or the accepter of his words.
If George and Dick had captured or killed Bin Laden they would have been out one Boogy man, then they would have had no one to scare the American people with!
Run Ya'll. Run! Bin Laden is after you!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
