Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
always my question is why are they doing this to the people? Why? I dont understand why a government would do this? Explain? I think most people know that this is bullcrap but my question always goes back to WHY???
"A spokesman for the Royal Society, Britain’s national academy of science, said: “The world’s leading climate experts at the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change believe that it is greater than 90 per cent likely that human activity is responsible for most of the observed warming in recent decades.
You do realize that the CRU is inextricably woven into those reports?
your quote could just as easily say:
Quote:
“The world’s leading climate experts at the CRU believe that it is grea..."
We'll find out in the Spring because my guess is the Energy bill is dead, if the EPA tries to enforce this themselves the GOP will be screaming bloody murder.
This is not good and all based on the lie that is man made global warming.
"Officials gather in Copenhagen this week for an international climate summit, but business leaders are focusing even more on Washington, where the Obama administration is expected as early as Monday to formally declare carbon dioxide a dangerous pollutant.
An "endangerment" finding by the Environmental Protection Agency could pave the way for the government to require businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions -- even if Congress doesn't pass pending climate-change legislation. EPA action to regulate emissions could affect the U.S. economy more directly, and more quickly, than any global deal inked in the Danish capital, where no binding agreement is expected.
Many business groups are opposed to EPA efforts to curb a gas as ubiquitous as carbon dioxide.
An EPA endangerment finding "could result in a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project," U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said in a statement. "The devil will be in the details, and we look forward to working with the government to ensure we don't stifle our economic recovery," he said, noting that the group supports federal legislation."
How do you declare CO2 a health danger when vegitation needs it for photsynthesis, emits it, and humans require it in order to live? Why not just start killing off people? Friggin idiots.
always my question is why are they doing this to the people? Why? I dont understand why a government would do this? Explain? I think most people know that this is bullcrap but my question always goes back to WHY???
Steve, I know this sound all "black helicopter" and all... but....
The real goal of AGW crowd really isn’t saving the environment. Look at the Copenhagen Conference and the stated agenda.
They want the western nations that have become the most wealthy to pay trillions of dollars to poor nations.
What does that sound like? Let’s not kid ourselves. This is, and always has been the goal of the AGW “green” crowd.
Btw, does anybody have a copy of that Petition, or a list of the names of the scientists who signed it?
The petition in question is a bit dubious and it's not something I would personally use as resource, I'm not saying it is or isn;t legitimate but I carefully select any information I use:
Do you, or or does anybody, have a copy of that petition or at least a list of the names of the scientists who signed it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.