Palin Op-Ed in WaPo; obama's politicalization of "science" (enemy, support)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Plenty of papers and work out there. You could find it if you were really at all interested, which I know you are not, so don't waste people's time.
Lol. So rather then discuss the science you prefer to make your judgements from blogs, pundits, petitions, and Sarah Palin? Talk about wasting peoples time.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,299 posts, read 54,213,280 times
Reputation: 40623
Quote:
Originally Posted by machiavelli1
Typical ******* hypocrisy.... Dismissing others links and points while acting like theirs are credible
Dismissing links? Once again you make baseless accusations Mocky, the woman demanded evidence to prove a point while when asked for her own evidence claimed she knows from the reaction of others. And the post I was treferring to had NO links Mister NeoTard.
Once again , your bluffs called ace, put up or shut up
Dismissing links? Once again you make baseless accusations Mocky, the woman demanded evidence to prove a point while when asked for her own evidence claimed she knows from the reaction of others. And the post I was treferring to had NO links Mister NeoTard.
Once again , your bluffs called ace, put up or shut up
Examples?
Must I own you AGAIN??
Wow, lets see, the OP posted a link and you once again said it has no crediblility because you don't agree with it. Ahhh, *******s with extreme partisanship, gotta love em'
Forget the ace there burry, I got the royal flush when responding to you
[quote=Katiana;11962553]I think I hit a nerve!
quote]
The only nerve this type of thing may be hitting is the one that starts smarting over irrelevent and annoying ...not to mention just plain wrong...digressions from the topic
As to the topic.
I wouldn't care if every single thing she wrote was 100% wrong as long as it finally brought the issue more into the view of the general public and resulted in some response.
Regardless of which side of the issue is ultimately right, the fact that some of the data is now suspect needs to be examined.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,299 posts, read 54,213,280 times
Reputation: 40623
Quote:
Originally Posted by machiavelli1
Must I own you AGAIN??
Wow, lets see, the OP posted a link and you once again said it has no crediblility because you don't agree with it. Ahhh, *******s with extreme partisanship, gotta love em'
Forget the ace there burry, I got the royal flush when responding to you
Own me? BwaaaaaHaHaHa! You don't even own a glancing contact with reality.
Once again ace, cite EXACTLY which post where this alleged dismissal of the OP takes place.
Until then there's only two choices, your're delusional or a liar. Oh, WAIT! Third choice, delusional liar.
Own me? BwaaaaaHaHaHa! You don't even own a glancing contact with reality.
Once again ace, cite EXACTLY which post where this alleged dismissal of the OP takes place.
Until then there's only two choices, your're delusional or a liar. Oh, WAIT! Third choice, delusional liar.
How about reality, post 134 is the latest of many by you. Owned you again there son
By the way, although not surprised, personal attacks )calling someone delusional or a liar) are against the terms of service
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.