Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wonder if right wingers pay people to spread their BS on message boards. Like the ghost writers that work for the GOP. They send letters to the editors of random news papers.
Show me where she displayed anger in this interview? You can't. So instead you make a baseless claim and utilize a derogatory term.
You might actually want to watch the clip and then comment.
Rachael comes off generally as a wise-cracking, snide personality. I don't need to show you anything. I've seen her show enough to know what I"m talking about and caught a bit of the interview last night while flipping channels. Her show is solely opinion-based, not straight reporting, and she comes off as an angry elitist.
I wonder if right wingers pay people to spread their BS on message boards. Like the ghost writers that work for the GOP. They send letters to the editors of random news papers.
Now that you mention it, wouldn't surprise me in the least. They are not bothered by such things as facts and proofs to the contrary, only the scurrilous lies that they hope will advance their perverse desire to control every aspect of every American's life.
Rachael comes off generally as a wise-cracking, snide personality. I don't need to show you anything. I've seen her show enough to know what I"m talking about and caught a bit of the interview last night while flipping channels. Her show is solely opinion-based, not straight reporting, and she comes off as an angry elitist.
Obviously you didn't watch the interview. She owned the idiot with his own book.
Rachael comes off generally as a wise-cracking, snide personality. I don't need to show you anything. I've seen her show enough to know what I"m talking about and caught a bit of the interview last night while flipping channels. Her show is solely opinion-based, not straight reporting, and she comes off as an angry elitist.
Rachael Madcow is an angry dyke. This interview was right up her alley.
cobolt,
I think she was just angry that this guy (unlicensed by anyone in any state) couldn't even remember what words he used in his own book, claiming he could cure homosexuality and that his book helped fuel the killings in Uganda. It's an issue that is personal for her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
