Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well if Doctor Zero said it on a blog, I guess the case is closed.
I can't believe you all actually put credence in these fanatics. They're not more educated about these subjects than the people posting on this forum.
Next.
And not one issue/point are you capable of disputing.
Quote:
You really don't know what you're talking about. You should stop.
Yes, plants absorb carbon dioxide. They clean the air because they absord so much of it. It doesn't mean we need excess of it.
Some good - too much bad. Didn't they teach you this in school?
That's funny. Not one of the mental midgets on this forum has been able to dispute any of the facts laid out. they can't even be bothered to go check for themselves if what the fanatics tell them is actually true. Like the polar ice cap - go check it out....or are you afraid you will find the truth?
How much Co2 is bad? Plants love it, shell fish really like it. Give me a number - and not the ridiculous 350 ppb from the IPCC.
Did you notice the date on your article in the first link? 2005......things have changed since then....or can't you be bothered with going and actually checking the state of arctic ice for yourself?
Here, don't believe me, look for yourself. In fact, compare to 2005 and 2007.
The authors of the report, however, did not state a consensus of opinion on the reason for the continued melting.
The report authors did discuss and reference the work of Georg Kaser, a glaciologist at the Institute for Geography of the University of Innsbruck in Austria, who believes that the recent melting is caused by a decline of humidity and moisture. According the Kaser’s research, there has been a marked reduction in precipitation and cloud cover in East Africa during the 20th C. that has led to an increase in solar radiation and a decrease in snow.
The lead author appears to favor global warming as the cause of melting, but the report does not state outright or plainly that man-made global warming is too blame.
Who is it that doesn't know what she's talking about? You should quit while you're behind. Maybe actually read the article next time to see if it corroborates the point you are attempting to make.
I think you're in denial that snow and ice on mountaintops which has been around for thousands of years, isn't really melting? It's just imaginary.
And those glaciers covering Minnesota have completely melted away also. Lets please hurry up and cool the earth and bring back that glacier, then we can send Al Franken home...
what is "global warming"? and why does al gore run away when hes asked about it?
How has he run away from it? He talks about it in every interview he gives.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
