Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're trying to change the topic again but I'll answer anyway. Flight 93 was all part of the same terrorist attack on 9-11. I don't separate them.
It's not up to you to decide which forums I post in or not.
You come into this thread complaining about the reference to 9/11 and your personal connections to the event, and then come back with that response? Don't complain or don't visit this thread. It's really pretty simple.
Again, all you have done is taken a comparison of response times and translated it into a comparison of the two attacks. This is falacious at the core, and I believe you know that. Re-read the OP. NOTHING in the OP compares the actual events. The OP compares the response. That's it! Nothing more! But you insist on twisting this into some sort of immoral debate that diminishes the memory of the 3,000+ who died. I would reconcile that it is YOU that are injecting these folks into the conversation, not me.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
There is absolutely NO misunderstanding in my remarks. None.
And I don;t ahve any idea why I tried to give you a reasonable response, I knew it would be a wasted effort.
You are trying to compare the response time of a successful terrorist attack, the worst in our history, tot he response time of an unsuccessful attack, completely throwing the deaths of the former in the toilet so you can take a swipe at a political figure.
Try and twist your amoral behavior as you will, it won;t change the fact that your actions are absolutely shameful.
The sheer horror of that event should've guarenteed the safety of the memories of the victims, the survivors, and the memories of the victim's survivers, guarenteed they would be protected from such shameful bahavior as you have shown us on this thread.
Your OP, and succeeding posts, have shown a complete disregard for those deaths, for the survivors, for the trauma of the victim's survivors as well.
Actually, I could say the same for so many liberals in this country, including many on this forum, who continue to defend Islamist enemies of our nation. As I said earlier in this thread, liberals have done nothing BUT attempt to trivialize the horrors of 9/11. I would call what we have here "phoney outrage."
Again, all you have done is taken a comparison of response times and translated it into a comparison of the two attacks. This is falacious at the core, and I believe you know that. Re-read the OP. NOTHING in the OP compares the actual events. The OP compares the response. That's it! Nothing more! But you insist on twisting this into some sort of immoral debate that diminishes the memory of the 3,000+ who died. I would reconcile that it is YOU that are injecting these folks into the conversation, not me.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Just comparing response times and expecting the same level of presidential response IS placing these two events on an equal footing even if you didn't describe the two attacks in detail. And how could anyone not inject the lives of 3000 people into the debate when talking about something related to 9-11?
There is absolutely NO misunderstanding in my remarks. None.
And I don;t ahve any idea why I tried to give you a reasonable response, I knew it would be a wasted effort.
You are trying to compare the response time of a successful terrorist attack, the worst in our history, tot he response time of an unsuccessful attack, completely throwing the deaths of the former in the toilet so you can take a swipe at a political figure.
Try and twist your amoral behavior as you will, it won;t change the fact that your actions are absolutely shameful.
"Throwing the deaths.....in the toilet."
"Amoral behavior."
"Absolutely shameful."
And you say you're not a liberal? Attacking the person is a play right out of the liberal playbook.
You know, as well as I do, this has nothing to do with the victims of 9/11, no matter how hard you try to spin it.
Actually, I could say the same for so many liberals in this country, including many on this forum, who continue to defend Islamist enemies of our nation. As I said earlier in this thread, liberals have done nothing BUT attempt to trivialize the horrors of 9/11. I would call what we have here "phoney outrage."
If I was a liberal, you'd have the beginings of a point.
There is absolutely NO misunderstanding in my remarks. None.
And I don;t ahve any idea why I tried to give you a reasonable response, I knew it would be a wasted effort.
You are trying to compare the response time of a successful terrorist attack, the worst in our history, tot he response time of an unsuccessful attack, completely throwing the deaths of the former in the toilet so you can take a swipe at a political figure.
Try and twist your amoral behavior as you will, it won;t change the fact that your actions are absolutely shameful.
My Pet Goat Goat was political fodder for the left for 8 years, and now you deny it with this tripe? LOL
Actually, I could say the same for so many liberals in this country, including many on this forum, who continue to defend Islamist enemies of our nation. As I said earlier in this thread, liberals have done nothing BUT attempt to trivialize the horrors of 9/11. I would call what we have here "phoney outrage."
You got it.
Its A-Ok for them to use the deaths of 3000 innocent in their garbage films and political fodder.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.