The Eligibility Thread (claim, document, best, city)

[Arus]

Originally Posted by ergohead

The questions to the Supreme Court were, how is Wong a U.S. citizen, or not?

SC answer: Is, by solis juris - not, by solis sanguin.

Wong made it half-way to Constitutional qualification for U.S. presidency.

not according to the ruling. basic reading comprehension a problem i see for all of the birthers.

[Arus]

Originally Posted by Wayland Woman

Maybe you didn't but someone did. Look at the lower, right hand corner where the 'native citizen' definition is in your post #2360 (link below) and you can clearly see a shadow around where a paper containing that 'native citizen' definition was placed on top of the book's page before copying. It's also very clear that that paper with the 'native citizen' definition is a different paper quality---whiter and brighter than the book's page paper.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/14185819-post2360.html

oh my god, that is a horrible shop job. the scan resolution and sizing is all wrong

[DraggingCanoe]

http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/16052010.jpg (broken link)

[Arus]

showing us a book cover doens't mean jack. show use the entry on citizen. even a cel phone camera can pick it up easily

[DraggingCanoe]

http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/16052010001.jpg (broken link)

[Arus]

if you're going to spam just images of portions of the book that has nothing to do with your claims then you are just going to be ignored

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

There is essentially none. All Thesauri list them as exact synonyms.

Look deeper.

Lawful Money

And then, of course, there's color of law.

"Color of title may arise when there is evidence, such as a writing, suggesting valid legal title."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law)

The Constitution is the law of the land.

Congressional and legislative statutes are less, and only relate to legalities.

It may be illegal to smoke pot, but it is definitely not unlawful to smoke pot.

That is a right protected by many sections of the U.S. Constitution, which is the law of the land, and which supersedes all legislated "law" repugnant to it.

[Arus]

Originally Posted by ergohead

The Constitution is the law of the land.

Congressional and legislative statutes are less, and only relate to legalities.

No, the Constitution is a document that guides in how we construct our laws for our nation. Which is why its called a living document; its meant to be changed over time to meet the needs of whenever, whatever the social needs of the land are. Our laws are based on the Constitution.

[DraggingCanoe]

http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/16052010004.jpg (broken link)

[ergohead]

Originally Posted by Arus

not according to the ruling. basic reading comprehension a problem i see for all of the birthers.

He who can read can sometimes write.

You are obviously capable of neither.