Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-08-2010, 12:32 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
enemy combatsnt is not a POW,
You're so very right. One is an accredited and acknowledged term, used by civilized nations. The other is a BS made-up phrase whose sole purpose is to sound better than "nonperson with no rights". But you were the one who started out with the POW nonsense.

Quote:
please tell me who was hanged for waterboarding
I stand corrected. Yukio Asano wasn't actually hanged, merely sentenced to 15 years of hard labor at his war crimes tribunal.

Waterboarding was a favorite in the Imperial Japanese Army - and Pol Pot's torturers used it as well, to great effect. Waterboard somebody long enough, and he'll confess to counter-revolutionary activity. Great for filling mass graves. Worthless for actual intelligence gathering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2010, 12:37 PM
 
46,943 posts, read 25,964,420 times
Reputation: 29434
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
2. Those who are not citizens are not subject to our laws.
You just failed the US Citizenship Exam, good job!

Quote:
There should be no trials, no courts, no lawyers.
As luck would have it, your nation's founders were a good deal smarter than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 12:53 PM
 
1,025 posts, read 1,751,615 times
Reputation: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
Right now as it stands the process is contradictory. Sometimes we treat them one way, sometimes another. For example, Hasan (Ft. Hood shooter) is being tried differently. Yet, he's a terrorist.

Underwear bomber will be tried in our court system. Don't be surprised if his lawyer pleads mental instability /insanity (no kidding!) and he gets a lighter sentence. And then he'll have access to TV, the internet, libraries, physical exercise...all of it. Maybe - not maybe -- definitely even a special diet and a prayer rug. And visitors. Let's not forget the visitors.
Not excusing what he did, but what makes him different than let's say a Timothy McVeigh, beside his religious background? He is a natural born US citizen. I'm always hearing Islamic terrorist..Islamic terrorist, from the right, but we also need to not forgot other people who are just as equally crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 12:56 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,687,867 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by e2ksj3 View Post
Not excusing what he did, but what makes him different than let's say a Timothy McVeigh, beside his religious background? He is a natural born US citizen. I'm always hearing Islamic terrorist..Islamic terrorist, from the right, but we also need to not forgot other people who are just as equally crazy.
All I'm saying is that there is inconsistency in how these people are handled and tried, and that may easily convey that the US doesn't know what to do and how to do it.

Not a good thing to project IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,218,480 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
You're so very right. One is an accredited and acknowledged term, used by civilized nations. The other is a BS made-up phrase whose sole purpose is to sound better than "nonperson with no rights". But you were the one who started out with the POW nonsense.

I stand corrected. Yukio Asano wasn't actually hanged, merely sentenced to 15 years of hard labor at his war crimes tribunal.

Waterboarding was a favorite in the Imperial Japanese Army - and Pol Pot's torturers used it as well, to great effect. Waterboard somebody long enough, and he'll confess to counter-revolutionary activity. Great for filling mass graves. Worthless for actual intelligence gathering.
the term enemy combatant is not a BS term.

enemy combatant legal definition of enemy combatant. enemy combatant synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.

the term came from the third Geneva convention of 1949.

the United States took into custody over five hundred individuals they labeled enemy combatants. This designation, which is also referred to as unlawful combatants, gives detainees fewer rights than those conferred on prisoners of war by the Third Geneva Convention (1949).

According to the articles of the convention, a lawful combatant must be part of an organized command structure; wear openly visible emblems to identify themselves as non-civilians; carry arms out in the open; and respect the Rules of War, which would include not taking hostages.

so either they are enemy Combatants, POWs or civilian prisoners.
which ever one you wish to call them will determine the treatment and method of trial.
An enemy combatant or a POW can be tried by a military tribunal. A civilian must be tried by a civilian court. Bush labeled the gitmo gang enemy combatants , Obama has made them a civilian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:29 PM
 
Location: San Jose
1,862 posts, read 2,385,154 times
Reputation: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
1) so you cant name what trial did this and who were hanged.

2) So find the people and find what they were convicted of.

3) should be in the Nuremberg trials

then come back
This link appears to point to a hanging:
Paul Begala: Yes, National Review, We Did Execute Japanese for Waterboarding

A quote from the link:
"McCain is referencing the Tokyo Trials, officially known as the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. After World War II, an international coalition convened to prosecute Japanese soldiers charged with torture. At the top of the list of techniques was water-based interrogation, known variously then as 'water cure,' 'water torture' and 'waterboarding,' according to the charging documents. It simulates drowning." Politifact went on to report, "A number of the Japanese soldiers convicted by American judges were hanged, while others received lengthy prison sentences or time in labor camps."

And this link:
The Garret Tree: The Japanese waterboarding debate widens

Provides names but doesn't say which ones were hanged and which ones weren't. I could google their names but I've done enough for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:43 PM
 
1,025 posts, read 1,751,615 times
Reputation: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
All I'm saying is that there is inconsistency in how these people are handled and tried, and that may easily convey that the US doesn't know what to do and how to do it.

Not a good thing to project IMHO.
I see what you are saying, but each case & situation is different. I just think the right is overreacting to this whole. They act like the Obama Administration is going to let him go or give him probation. This guy is going to go a federal maximum security prison. It's ironic that the Bush Administration did the same thing with Richard Reid, but you didn't hear the same rhetoric from the left that you are hearing from right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Mississippi
3,047 posts, read 2,825,085 times
Reputation: 699
"We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation."
- George W. Bush
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:55 PM
 
8,762 posts, read 11,569,482 times
Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
kudos to the president for coming to an understanding we are at a war with Al Queda. Now please treat it like a war. And treat the soldiers of this war as soldiers at war.
Oh..but I thought you were "prolife".

Funny how the "prolifers" are the ones who are ALWAYS drooling over some sort of war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2010, 01:57 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,436,651 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
If he thinks we are at war why does he insist on civilian trial for prisoners of war

You got a good point with that one!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top