Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Remember?

Bill Clinton says Obama's campaign brought race into presidential contest

Quote:
CHARLESTON, S.C. - Bill Clinton angrily denied Wednesday that his wife's campaign was engaged in any dirty tricks and declared that it was Barack Obama's side - not the Clintons - who injected race into the contest.

"She did not play the race card, but they did," he charged, saying he was quoting Clinton backers and civil rights leaders Andrew Young and John Lewis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
To me (and I bet to most of us), this thread is only more confirmation that some people are desperate to tear down Obama and Democrats.

Surely Republicans can come up with something better than this, can't they? (although watching Michael Steele lately, I'm not so sure...)
Obviously, Politico thinks it is "newsworthy".

You don't like it - don't post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:23 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,309,239 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by pommysmommy View Post
That statement means that Clinton did not consider Obama an equal. That is racist.
Tone of voice and body language is EVERYTHING when someone makes a statement like that attributed to Clinton. He could have (and probably did) mean it in a complimentary way as in "look how far black men have come in such a short time." Unless you've seen a video tape of him saying it, you can't possibly judge this to be racist, or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I don't get it. How was that a racist statement? You must be assuming that getting coffee for someone is a stereotype of black people. Seems like an odd assumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:23 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,358,694 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Obviously, Politico thinks it is "newsworthy".

You don't like it - don't post.


It'd be much more likeable if it truly was blatant action by a party as you've alleged rather than typical back-room politicking. Your consistency in distorting reality is quite amazing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Tone of voice and body language is EVERYTHING when someone makes a statement like that attributed to Clinton. He could have (and probably did) mean it in a complimentary way as in "look how far black men have come in such a short time." Unless you've seen a video tape of him saying it, you can't possibly judge this to be racist, or not.
According to the source, it was THIS comment that so incensed him, that he turned away from Hillary.

Obviously, Teddy took it that way.

With the "racial" overtones of the democratic primary, it is clear Clinton hurt Hillary's campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,704,934 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Tone of voice and body language is EVERYTHING when someone makes a statement like that attributed to Clinton. He could have (and probably did) mean it in a complimentary way as in "look how far black men have come in such a short time." Unless you've seen a video tape of him saying it, you can't possibly judge this to be racist, or not.
He also could have meant that more in an elitist way than a racial way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:28 PM
 
9,855 posts, read 10,409,326 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
According to the source, it was THIS comment that so incensed him, that he turned away from Hillary.

Obviously, Teddy took it that way.
Bingo! The left can deny it all they want but Bill Clinton screwed things up for Hillary by his blatant dislike of Obama. I think Ted Kennedy endorsed Obama because he disliked Bill Clinton's attitude towards Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,332,595 times
Reputation: 73931
Quote:
Originally Posted by pommysmommy View Post
That statement means that Clinton did not consider Obama an equal. That is racist.
There are lots of reasons to think someone is not your equal that don't involve race.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,932,670 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
He also could have meant that more in an elitist way than a racial way.
Why did the comment "so incense" Teddy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:32 PM
 
Location: NE Phoenix!
687 posts, read 1,945,842 times
Reputation: 432
A reasonable interpretation. After all, don't interns and assistants fetch coffee? It may have been a jab at his inexperience.

But I don't know. I wasn't there and nothing in the OP's link that proves this did or did not have racist undertones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top