U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:39 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,151 posts, read 5,596,248 times
Reputation: 1752

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
He would rather spend 200b on a mock trial then helping people save their homes from foreclosure.

Someone has their priorities messed up.
Well sunny day looking for the President to save someones mortgage I thought you didnt believe in that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:42 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,151 posts, read 5,596,248 times
Reputation: 1752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Would you at least acknowledge that Reagan's ratings followed the EXACT same trajectory as he dealt with very similar issues? Therefore, please affirm the following statement:

"I, Sunny-Days90, do declare the presidency of Ronald Reagan a failure because his approval ratings went below 40% in his initial two years and unemployment remained above 10% almost 3 years into Reagan's presidency."


It's really the only logical conclusion that can be drawn from your attacks on Obama. I await your confirmation with enthusiasm.
WOW that was perfect!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 4,970,340 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Goodness, we are not talking about a corner grocery store killer here.

We are talking about an enemy combatant who are known as terrorist.

And yes, in his position, he should NOT be saying the outcome of the trial before the trail even begins.

Which they can use by stating they cannot get a fair trial in America because Obama had said this.

Guess we will wait and see.



* By the way, even Holder said the same thing and he is very much part of this trial.
The scale of who or what is on trial has no bearing on whether a person not of interest said how it will result. Obama is the president. He's not the judge, nor a jury member, witness, nor a prosecuting or public attorney. He's a nonfactor. His statements mean nothing in terms of the legality (or lack of) in a fair trial. Those tried will all likely get the death penalty and his approval ratings will rise. Eric Holder is the attorney general, IE the chief law enforcement official in the country. It's not his job to uphold the legal system, but rather to decide who is criminal and who is not. And could you please post the link where he supposedly echoed Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 4,970,340 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
More like from a high around 70% to under 50 in less than a year. No other has fallen so far so fast.

As his poll numbers continue to tank, there will be less and less democrats in the house and senate willing to put their careers on the line for him.
Considering Obama won 52% of the vote, I have no idea how you believe his approval rating was near 70%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:44 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,501 posts, read 13,396,740 times
Reputation: 4876
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Well sunny day looking for the President to save someones mortgage I thought you didnt believe in that

This was Obamas idea when he was a campaign liar.

Humm, Obama was suppose to create the jobs to save those peoples homes and failed.

Humm, Obama came up with a mortgage relief idea that never panned out and of course failed.

If he is going to waste 200 billion dollars on a pile of waste I would rather see that money be put to better use.

Simple, priorities are to help save Americans homes, not to protect terrorist who want to kill Americans.

Which side are you on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:47 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,151 posts, read 5,596,248 times
Reputation: 1752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Reagan was a failed President??

Says who?

He is often mentioned as one of the greatest President we have ever had.

Like it or not, the man was a leader, something we don't have right now.
Thats not what he asked you. Answer the question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 4,970,340 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Reagan was a failed President??

Says who?

He is often mentioned as one of the greatest President we have ever had.

Like it or not, the man was a leader, something we don't have right now.
Depending on what TV channel is on. I don't hate nor love Reagan. I commend him for his handeling of the Cold War but the fact of the matter is: he sold chemical weapons to rogue nations, he sold weapons to what would be considered terrorist groups, he slashed education budgets and worst of all he got these Moral Majority psychos involved with politics. Besides compromising his integrity by selling weapons, he did commercials for cigarettes. The man was a sellout. He'd have done Victoria's Secret commercials if the money was right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:50 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,501 posts, read 13,396,740 times
Reputation: 4876
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
Considering Obama won 52% of the vote, I have no idea how you believe his approval rating was near 70%.

Another Obama supporter that has no clue.

What does 52% of th evote have to do with 70% approval rating?

Obamas approval rating in January of last year was above 65% in most polls and 70% in some.

He has DROPPED or TANKED the most of anyone in the WH ever.

Here is a nice place for you to start, by the way, wont be long before his little red line crosses the black line and he will have more who disapprove then approve. Thus setting another record for the quickest ever to have more disapproval then approval.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval

Watch the little red line, do you see it rising?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:51 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,151 posts, read 5,596,248 times
Reputation: 1752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
This was Obamas idea when he was a campaign liar.

Humm, Obama was suppose to create the jobs to save those peoples homes and failed.

Humm, Obama came up with a mortgage relief idea that never panned out and of course failed.

If he is going to waste 200 billion dollars on a pile of waste I would rather see that money be put to better use.

Simple, priorities are to help save Americans homes, not to protect terrorist who want to kill Americans.

Which side are you on?
You forgot we won, 200 billion goes to what the winners decide it goes to. Get use to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:51 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,501 posts, read 13,396,740 times
Reputation: 4876
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Thats not what he asked you. Answer the question.

I answered it, you just did not understand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top