Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Smoke and mirrors yet AGAIN from you. I was not talking about Obama. I was talking about your posted news item, which included the fact that Bush admitted his administration's failure to respond properly. You twist words, do not admit your errors, and chase your own tail.
I did not allude to Obama's response, which is far better and not yet fully in place. You type fast, think slow.
Bush was still adding troops nine (9) days after Katrina. Admits it was not enough. Other posters besides me are posting the same, but you still deny.
Ahh no.. i'm more than happy to discuss the military personnel on the ground, or lack of in this case.. I only brought up aid works in response to individuals claiming how difficult it is to get people there to help. Somehow these aid works managed but the larges country in the world with unlimited resources can only provide excuses..
Bush had 100 times as many military personnel by this time than Obama.. but shhh dont tell people..
Instead of a 7.0 earthquake in Haiti which is a very poor nation in which most people probably wish they could afford anything with tires, couldn't there be a big one in CA that dumps uber-liberal, nanny government proponents into the ocean, never to be seen or heard from again?
Smoke and mirrors yet AGAIN from you. I was not talking about Obama. I was talking about your posted news item, which included the fact that Bush admitted his administration's failure to respond properly. You twist words, do not admit your errors, and chase your own tail.
I did not allude to Obama's response, which is far better and not yet fully in place. You type fast, think slow.
Bush was still adding troops nine (9) days after Katrina. Admits it was not enough. Other posters besides me are posting the same, but you still deny.
Smoke and mirrors yet AGAIN from you. I was not talking about Obama. I was talking about your posted news item, which included the fact that Bush admitted his administration's failure to respond properly. You twist words, do not admit your errors, and chase your own tail.
I did not allude to Obama's response, which is far better and not yet fully in place. You type fast, think slow.
Bush was still adding troops nine (9) days after Katrina. Admits it was not enough. Other posters besides me are posting the same, but you still deny.
Republicon trait.
Thats not even CLOSE to what you said..
Quote:
Originally Posted by eloyfan
Which couldn't get the job done.
You can now spin your response into something other than what you meant, which was that Obama got the job done and Bush didnt. Yes, Bush was still adding troops 9 days later, why wouldnt he? Why wouldnt he send in 100,000 if thats what was needed? Where in the world have I denied that he was still sending more? I judged where he was FIVE days after Katrina.. Its YOU who changed the subject to 9 days later, as if Obama if planning to Bush even 9 days out because he's not..
Quote:
Originally Posted by eloyfan
Lie.
What part is a LIE? Really GIVE ME FACTS.. What did I LIE about? You are making the claim, can you back it up?
Um, most of the threads you listed are liberals making attacks against conservatives, or arent even attacks at all. I mean seriously, a link about Sean Penn?
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002
The means of politicizing this tragedy by Republicans dwarf any attempt at the hands of a Democrat. This entire forum is a prime example.
You found a few Republican postings, most of these arent though.. but do you want to look for the politicizing of 911, or Katrina and see how many threads you find to compare? Of course you dont want to do that!!!
You can now spin your response into something other than what you meant, which was that Obama got the job done and Bush didnt. Yes, Bush was still adding troops 9 days later, why wouldnt he? Why wouldnt he send in 100,000 if thats what was needed? Where in the world have I denied that he was still sending more? I judged where he was FIVE days after Katrina.. Its YOU who changed the subject to 9 days later, as if Obama if planning to Bush even 9 days out because he's not..
What part is a LIE? Really GIVE ME FACTS.. What did I LIE about? You are making the claim, can you back it up?
Certainly! Last I heard, (and I have been watching more football than not today) is at least 2000 Marines in country on Thursday (at the latest) and what 3500 more by now? And 6500 more by Monday? So, Bush had 100X more in place by now is a LIE. Please say otherwise and we'll both know who's crazy.
Obama has not finished with his orderly, intelligent response.
I also said the troops in N.O. had not got the job done by day 6, 7, 8 or 9. Standing FACT. YOU twist, and it seems I am getting to you now. Need a Kleenex?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
