Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The California Supreme Court today struck down the state's limits on how much medical marijuana a patient can possess, concluding that the restrictions imposed by the Legislature were an unconstitutional amendment of a 1996 voter-approved initiative.
The California Supreme Court today struck down the state's limits on how much medical marijuana a patient can possess, concluding that the restrictions imposed by the Legislature were an unconstitutional amendment of a 1996 voter-approved initiative.
I wonder how many actually use it for "medical" purposes?
Rogue doctors and rogue patients are certainly a byproduct of this law. I don't see how it can be avoided. I've always wondered what controls are in place to ensure legitimate use. As with everything in California, nothing is legitimate. The idea just sounds good, so they do it.
I wonder how many actually use it for "medical" purposes?
It doesn't matter. It's about personal freedom and not having the government control everything that we do while they rape us for taxes.
All of this is just the first step to getting it completely legalized. In California is practically is legalized. It's incredibly easy to get a medical card and even if you get caught without one the penalties are nothing.
I wonder how many actually use it for "medical" purposes?
I would suggest that 100% of users use it for 'medical' purposes. What smoking pot did for me no doctor or psychiatrist could have done, although neither could have prescribed the weed.
The California Supreme Court today struck down the state's limits on how much medical marijuana a patient can possess, concluding that the restrictions imposed by the Legislature were an unconstitutional amendment of a 1996 voter-approved initiative.
The vast majority of marijuana users don't cause any problems for society. It should be legal.
Glad you feel that way. The same holds true for guns: The vast majority of gun owners don't cause any problems for society. We would be safer, with much less crime, if everyone were allowed to carry, either concealed or openly. Most people still wouldn't, of course, but some would... and the criminals wouldn't know which ones they were.
One difference between MJ and guns: The Constitution does NOT say that the right to get high shall not be infringed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
muy bueno
