Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This thread is more like reading a gossip rag than anything else. I don't think that their personal affairs are any of our business, at least I really don't care one way or another because it has nothing to do with my life or any one I know. The topic would fit right in on a Jerry Springer show, well maybe not, the Steve Wilkos show would be better.
Hell, Im a grown man with a degree and a legit job and I won't pay 1,750 a month for a child that I can't see! that whole group of fools needs to grow up!
Although I do believe based upon my observations that it is most always wrong not to be able to see your child and that the courts can be ridiculous in the demands on a man, I would be curious of two things. What is it that would make a judge rule that you cannot see your child? Why do you think your child is not deserving of your support because of your dispute with the mother. It isn't the childs fault? Pay the b***h!
This thread is more like reading a gossip rag than anything else. I don't think that their personal affairs are any of our business, at least I really don't care one way or another because it has nothing to do with my life or any one I know. The topic would fit right in on a Jerry Springer show, well maybe not, the Steve Wilkos show would be better.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.