Why dont pro-military "republicans" want to pay taxes to support the military (Baby Boomers, soldier)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We spend more for military than just what is listed under the defense budget(bill):
$965 billion:
• Military Personnel $129 billion
• Operation & Maint. $241 billion
• Procurement $143 billion
• Research & Dev. $79 billion
• Construction $15 billion
• Family Housing $3 billion
• DoD misc. $4 billion
• Retired Pay $70 billion
• DoE nuclear weapons $17 billion
• NASA (50%) $9 billion
• International Security $9 billion
• Homeland Secur. (military) $35 billion
• State Dept. (partial) $6 billion
• other military (non-DoD) $5 billion
• “Global War on Terror” $200 billion [We added $162 billion to the last item to supplement the Budget’s grossly underestimated $38 billion in “allowances” to be spent in 2009 for the “War on Terror,” which includes the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan]
Past Military,
$484 billion:
• Veterans’ Benefits $94 billion
• Interest on national debt (80%) created by military spending, $390 billion
It really depends on where you want your tax dollars spent - here or over there and everywhere else? If I'm going to pay taxes - I want it spent here
No, he didn't. Where are you getting that from? I was around for those horrible Carter years. I remember. Long gas lines, double digit inflation, double digit interest rates, and Carter cut the military. If I'm wrong, prove it? That was one of the things Reagan campaigned on. Carter had reduced our military. Reagan believed in a stong defense.
It was near the end of his presidency, in 1980, which is probably why it is so heavily overshadowed. However, you are correct that military spending stagnated during the rest of his presidency.
You can actually read an original newspaper report on it here:
The Soviet Union maintained one of the largest armies in human history from 1940-1991. Far overshadowing the US in terms of troop count. The US had them beat in terms of technology, however.
Here is your typical white "working class" male who is arguing that Social Security is social spending on par with welfare. Never mind you don't get social security if you don't work. Never mind it comes from payroll taxes not Federal income taxes. He thinks we should do away with Social Security cause that's welfare for brown people. He wants to cut it rather than this grotesque Defense budget we have.
Do you see now why right wing middleclass and poor GOP voters can't even understand simple concepts that enable them to vote in their own interest?
Or maybe he thinks we should default on our interest payments? Putting Millions of senior citizens into bread lines?
here is the typical liberal elitest, who doesnt understand that SS is a pyramid scheme.
here is the typical liberal, who would rather have people not work and collect welfare, while the white middleclass SLAVES pay for everything
FACT:
300 billion to medicaid
430billion to medicare
560 billion to welfare
and let's not forget REDUNDANT department like the DoEducation..a UNNEEDED department since education is a STATE ISSUE
and then there is SS
we spend more on social programs than the military...that is FACT
Please please please have your fellow wingnuts get together and advocate cutting non-discretionary spending such as medicare, Social Security and interest on the debt.......LOL
The GOP and 3rd Party Libertarians would have their asses thrown out of office so fast your head would spin.
Thankfully, Americans not even paying attention are not as gullible and brainwashed as you are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.