Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,325,406 times
Reputation: 2889

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
Is this your premise or his premise?
It certainly isn't mine. Deduce what you will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,808,661 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
it was a "State of the Union" address. That implies the current state.

Mentioning what happened over a year ago is nothing more than blame.

and all his plans have been tried over and over for thousands of years in all sorts of different countries. They have never once worked. thay aint gonna work this time either.
Perhaps you should review the policies of Hoover that aggravated the great depression and the policies of FDR that brought us out of the depression.

The Great Depression and New Deal, 1929-1939 (http://iws.ccccd.edu/kwilkison/Online1302home/20th%20Century/DepressionNewDeal.html - broken link)

Quote:
President Herbert Hoover resisted calls for government intervention on behalf of individuals. He reiterated his belief that if left alone the economy would right itself and argued that direct government assistance to individuals would weaken the moral fiber of the American people. Hoover further believed that during hard times the government should adopt austerity measures, that is, cut spending even further.
Quote:
The "second" New Deal attempted to end the Depression by spending at the bottom of the economy where government funds attempted to turn non-consumers into consumers again. Many of the programs lasted only until World War II while others became permanent fixtures in American life. Here are three to illustrate the central thrust of the second New Deal. The Works Progress Administration was a huge federal jobs program that sought to hire unemployed breadwinners for the purpose strengthening their family's well-being as well as boosting consumer demand. The jobs varied but consisted of mainly of construction of public roads, buildings and parks. Over the course of its life (1935-43) over eight million Americans worked on WPA projects. This was "counter-cyclical demand management" on a huge scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,075,384 times
Reputation: 9795
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
The underlying premise that one can spend its way into prosperity. I thought that was inherent. Guess not.
Intent of cash for clunkers:
1 - increase auto sales to provide cash up and down the supply chain for auto manufacturers and dealers - SUCCESS
2 - remove less fuel efficient cars from the road to decrease pollution and reduce dependence on imported oil - SUCCESS
3 - disable old cars so as not to further depress the used car market - SUCCESS
4 - provide a one-time shot of cash infusion and sales to delay or prevent additional losses in the auto industry - MIXED RESULTS

Spending way to prosperity was not one of the criteria. Cushioning the effects of the depressed new car market and encouraging people and creditors to part with cash and circulate more money into the economy was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,075,384 times
Reputation: 9795
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupson1 View Post
How about we stop blaming anyone and realize we have been on this path for 30 years, both major parties and ourselves are at fault. We need to work hard and try to rebuild an economy based on growth and actual value instead of borrowing our way to temporary prosperity. Blaming seems to be a waste of time.In a free society, politicians aren't really responsable for the economy, no matter how much they claim to be in good times. So neither obama or bush should be singled out.Bush initiated the bailout plan for the economy if it works out he should get some of the credit. If it goes sour, remember obama would have done the same thing. The causes of the recent recession may be debatable but the fact that obama and bush acted fairly promptly and effectively to respond.From some of the things i have read the chinese are partly responsible by overloading the globel financial system. The failure of the chinese to construct a workable social security system has forced the chinese to save to a ridiculous extent. These savings were put into U S Treasury bills, the only debt market big enough to accommodate these hundreds of billions of dollars. This massive influx of capital created artificial price floors which collapsed, taking bear stearns and others with them.China has become our main competitor for natural resources,and china is unscupulous and merciless.A confrontation at some"distant outpost" is only a matter of time.
Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:02 PM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,523,345 times
Reputation: 1734
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
It certainly isn't mine. Deduce what you will.
I don't do deductions. But you did pretend to be able to read other people's minds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,325,406 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketSci View Post
Intent of cash for clunkers:
1 - increase auto sales to provide cash up and down the supply chain for auto manufacturers and dealers - SUCCESS
2 - remove less fuel efficient cars from the road to decrease pollution and reduce dependence on imported oil - SUCCESS
3 - disable old cars so as not to further depress the used car market - SUCCESS
4 - provide a one-time shot of cash infusion and sales to delay or prevent additional losses in the auto industry - MIXED RESULTS

Spending way to prosperity was not one of the criteria. Cushioning the effects of the depressed new car market and encouraging people and creditors to part with cash and circulate more money into the economy was.
Not a criteria, it was the premise. The government federally subsidized new car purchases, ala they spent borrowed/printed money we don't have to exact their end result... which failed. You may claim success all you like, but it's widely thought of as a failure by most measures.
- Bloomberg.com
Cash For Clunkers: A Failed Program | Daily Markets
E-Team | Cash For Clunkers Bill Failed To Accomplish Goals (http://environment.ncpa.org/news/cash-for-clunkers-bill-failed-to-accomplish-goals - broken link)
The High Cost of Cash for*Clunkers - Brief Analysis #674
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,325,406 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
I don't do deductions. But you did pretend to be able to read other people's minds.
Really? When??

Maybe I have a future in esp!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,075,384 times
Reputation: 9795
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
Not a criteria, it was the premise. The government federally subsidized new car purchases, ala they spent borrowed/printed money we don't have to exact their end result... which failed. You may claim success all you like, but it's widely thought of as a failure by most measures.
- Bloomberg.com
Cash For Clunkers: A Failed Program | Daily Markets
E-Team | Cash For Clunkers Bill Failed To Accomplish Goals (http://environment.ncpa.org/news/cash-for-clunkers-bill-failed-to-accomplish-goals - broken link)
The High Cost of Cash for*Clunkers - Brief Analysis #674
I see your "failure" articles and raise you "success" articles:

Life After Cash For Clunkers - Forbes.com
Q&A: Was Cash for Clunkers a Success? - TIME
Cash For Clunkers Success A Positive Economic Sign
ttp://www.foxbusiness.com/search-results/m/26071727/nada-chairman-on-the-success-of-clunkers.htm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:32 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 4,627,449 times
Reputation: 1671
Quote:
Originally Posted by soupson1 View Post
The causes of the recent recession may be debatable but the fact that obama and bush acted fairly promptly and effectively to respond.From some of the things i have read the chinese are partly responsible by overloading the globel financial system. The failure of the chinese to construct a workable social security system has forced the chinese to save to a ridiculous extent. These savings were put into U S Treasury bills, the only debt market big enough to accommodate these hundreds of billions of dollars. This massive influx of capital created artificial price floors which collapsed, taking bear stearns and others with them.
This is laughable, that you would condemn individuals in China for "oversaving" to a "ridiculous extent" for their personal, long-term economic security, which, in turn, helped cause the collapse. ??!

I suppose a huge Ponzi-scheme structured by the Chinese government (modeled on our great, broke Social Security system) is all the solution the poor billions of Chinese need? LOL!

That should really help fix the entire world's economy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Terra firma
1,372 posts, read 1,548,812 times
Reputation: 1122
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
As long as Obama is a screw up excuse me, he will continue to blame Bush, easy escape goat. He seems to have no problems blaming others for his failures.

The only person being "escape" goated, as you so creatively put it, is Obama himself. The Bush Administration fought a war on two fronts while cutting taxes at the same time. Aside from burning money in huge bon fires I can't think of a quicker way to bankrupt a nation. It's absolutely amazing that we didn't fall into a second great depression. It took a lot of gutsy decisions and massive action to keep that wolf from the door.

Fanklin D. Roosevelt brought the U.S. economy back to solvency with the same kind of massive action via his "New Deal" policies and work programs. And even in his time, and in spite of his success he was vilified as a socialist. Sound familiar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top