U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 600,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspapers.

Get a detailed profile of any city, county, or zip code:
      Search our forums (advanced):

Reply


 
Old 05-27-2007, 05:46 PM
Took ball and went home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coming soon to a town near YOU!
983 posts, read 622,019 times
Reputation: 1374
Evlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud of
Question What should the USA reduce or eliminate funding for?

The budget fight over Iraq war funding has been in the news lately...

What item in the US Budget (The war, oil company's subsidies, UN Funding, etc) do you think we should reduce funding for, or eliminate completely?

Please give your item, and then a quick description of why. Lets try to limit the first few posts to "item & explanation" before we try to argue why someone else's post is wrong

I'll start...

I think that we over-fund the Department of Defense. If we are talking about Defense, $600 Billion a year is overkill (regular plus supplemental budget)... I don't think we are using the DOD for just Defense, and it is the Offense that is costing us all the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2007, 05:51 PM
-=New Age Pirate=-
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ~33408~
880 posts, read 788,538 times
Reputation: 344
KoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the roughKoZmiC NinJa is a jewel in the rough
Military and oil co. give-a-ways....
Does it really need anymore explanation ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2007, 06:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Journey's End
10,185 posts, read 5,643,153 times
Reputation: 3186
ontheroad has a reputation beyond repute
ontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond reputeontheroad has a reputation beyond repute
Here's a chart which is pretty reliable (I double checked at the whitehouse site to confirm).

I probably wouldn't decrease funding in any given area, but I do see overlap and if we have overlap we undoubtedly have redundant funding. Consolidation and streamlining our resources and down-sizing large departments may be a huge savings--allowing for some changes in funding streams. And, although the percentages appear small in some cases, the total numbers are very high (see Justice).

Image:Fbs us fy2007.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 01:22 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
3,961 posts, read 1,526,816 times
Reputation: 943
doc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to behold
Department of education. Let the states run their schools.

Maybe the Dept. of Energy? What does it really do or rather what dos it accomplish?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 01:23 AM
INTJ Mastermind
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
1,831 posts, read 731,698 times
Reputation: 962
mhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to beholdmhouse2001 is a splendid one to behold
The Wikipedia chart might reflect the budget, but it doesn't reflect the bills. Defense is more than 50%.

As much as I believe defense spending should be not just cut, but eliminated, the reality is that the American population isn't ready to accept peace. It's too much in love with war, which means more spending, and more war, and more spending, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 01:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
2,433 posts, read 1,398,946 times
Reputation: 726
Hawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to beholdHawkeye48 is a splendid one to behold
Cut Department of Defense drastically. Even in peace time the DOD takes up far too much revenue, and we can't afford to keep doing it.



For those of you who want to try it, experiment with this online budget simulation. It's harder to balance the budget than you would think because there are so many fixed expenditures.


National Budget Simulation (broken link) (short version)

National Budget Simulation (broken link) (long version)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 01:50 AM
Took ball and went home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coming soon to a town near YOU!
983 posts, read 622,019 times
Reputation: 1374
Evlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud ofEvlevo has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye48 View Post
Cut Department of Defense drastically. Even in peace time the DOD takes up far too much revenue, and we can't afford to keep doing it.



For those of you who want to try it, experiment with this online budget simulation. It's harder to balance the budget than you would think because there are so many fixed expenditures.


National Budget Simulation (broken link) (short version)

National Budget Simulation (broken link) (long version)
Wow, simply "eliminating" the Bush tax cuts reduces the deficit by 75%!

And if you recind the tax cuts, stop the war in Iraq and increase the VA by 10%, you're there! (But then again I don't have lobbyists after me)

Great link!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 01:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
3,961 posts, read 1,526,816 times
Reputation: 943
doc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to beholddoc1 is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
but eliminated, the reality is that the American population isn't ready to accept peace. It's too much in love with war, which means more spending, and more war, and more spending, etc.
If the DOF were eliminated, how would we defend ourselves?

If you know people that are in love with war, get away and stay away from them. I know lots of people of varying politcal stripes but none like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2007, 06:41 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
198 posts
Reputation: 63
Southpoint will become famous soon enoughSouthpoint will become famous soon enough
Eliminate ALL tax loopholes. No tax deductions for anything and then simplify the tax code.

Cut off funding to ALL countries outside the US and to UN. If people want to give money to other countries, do it via charities.

Bring MOST troops home to protect our borders and pump MORE money into intelligence and defense. The heck with countries that hate us.

Eliminate 50% of social programs (aka, hold people back programs, rather than teaching people to be self sufficient).

THE most important thing the country can do, but will never be done is pass a new law that only ONE bill can be voted on at a time. It is either YES or NO on each individual bill. This would eliminate the pork barrel spending that is ruining this country. However, the Democrats AND Republicans will never go along with that, as it IS how they get in money for their buddies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 - Top