Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2010, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
3,390 posts, read 4,950,930 times
Reputation: 2049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
Remember when a million was a lot or even a billion. Now we are talking trillions and people dont really blink an eye.

We better start downsizing our house cars whatever because we are all going to be paying more taxes sooner or later.

They are taking us to new lows. The spending is unbelievable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2010, 08:42 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,861,813 times
Reputation: 2731
Amazing he is proposing this large of a budget after prancing around the country last week talking about "fiscal responsibility". Is Obama simply an idiot?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
I still vote to blame Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:05 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
After a very weak opening, thread analysts had hoped for a rally by mid-morning, but those hopes were soon dashed, as post quality proceeded to plummet on a series of unrelated personal comments and inane links to irrelevant graphics. As 10:30 approached, not one post concerning the actual thread topic had materialized, and some observers had begun to caution that the situation could now be expected only to deteriorate further...
What type of response were you looking for? One which proclaimed the OP and the $3.8 Trillion was wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:08 AM
 
1,599 posts, read 2,948,186 times
Reputation: 702
By way of comparison, the FY2010 budget was $3.721 trillion; the FY2009 budget, presented by President George W. Bush, was $3.518 trillion.

So blaming Bush doesn't seem so far-fetched. We've been dealing with trillion $ budgets for some time now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:08 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,846,025 times
Reputation: 1942
Lets look at the increase to the deficit by Obamas budget and Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by songgirl View Post
By way of comparison, the FY2010 budget was $3.721 trillion; the FY2009 budget, presented by President George W. Bush, was $3.518 trillion.

So blaming Bush doesn't seem so far-fetched. We've been dealing with trillion $ budgets for some time now.
Meh, what's another 200 billion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:13 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by songgirl View Post
By way of comparison, the FY2010 budget was $3.721 trillion; the FY2009 budget, presented by President George W. Bush, was $3.518 trillion.

So blaming Bush doesn't seem so far-fetched. We've been dealing with trillion $ budgets for some time now.
But Bush hasnt walked around preaching fiscal responsibility and freezing increased spending for how long?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
But Bush hasnt walked around preaching fiscal responsibility and freezing increased spending for how long?
Doesn't matter. All that matters to Obama-trons is that Bush was a republican, many republicans are for fiscal conservativism, so Bush had to be for fiscal conservativism.

On another note, a car has wheels, an amphibious vehicle can float on water and has wheels, therefore a car can float on water. Why didn't this work for fine statesmen like Teddy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 09:24 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
But Bush hasnt walked around preaching fiscal responsibility and freezing increased spending for how long?


People are waking up to the two visions of change. The one perceived vision, and the agendas vision. The two are not even remotely similar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top