Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep, I can feel like saying----Shut up O'Reilly at times but for the most part I find him funny and able to bring out some interesting things from his guests. Watch his interview with Blago. People know what they are getting when they go on his show. I can say he does the same interview with both libs and conservatives.
I watched him (interview???) more like Badger Blago for a few minutes.
He asked nothing of relevance and kept asking the same question over and over trying to get Blago to say that higher ups in the Dem party, Rahm Emanuel, David Axlerod, Tony Rezko or even Obamao were involved in his decision to appoint a Senator to fill Obamao's seat!
You could see that Blago was reluctant to answer that question.
He's under indictment, his lawyers have instructed him on what he can talk about, he could place himself in more jeopardy - I don't know
But there was O'Badger hammerin' away and getting nothing for his effort!
Weak!
Why he had Blago on in the first place is questionable! Ratings more than likely.
I watched him (interview???) more like Badger Blago for a few minutes.
He asked nothing of relevance and kept asking the same question over and over trying to get Blago to say that higher ups in the Dem party, Rahm Emanuel, David Axlerod, Tony Rezko or even Obamao were involved in his decision to appoint a Senator to fill Obamao's seat!
You could see that Blago was reluctant to answer that question.
He's under indictment, his lawyers have instructed him on what he can talk about, he could place himself in more jeopardy - I don't know
But there was O'Badger hammerin' away and getting nothing for his effort!
Weak!
Why he had Blago on in the first place is questionable! Ratings more than likely.
Go away O'Bloviator... You suck!
O'Reilly realized that Blago was not going to answer the questions he didn't want to.
Credit should be given to Bill for trying. It was worth a try and made Blago look even worse.
I don't think O'Reilly did it for "ratings" since Blago is hardly popular.
O'Reilly realized that Blago was not going to answer the questions he didn't want to.
Credit should be given to Bill for trying. It was worth a try and made Blago look even worse.
I don't think O'Reilly did it for "ratings" since Blago is hardly popular.
Q - Why doesn't good ol Bill invite others to his (fair and balanced) show: Dick Cheney about "gentle" interrogations of suspects and plans to invade Iraq before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld on similar issues, former senator Larry Craig, Mark Sanford, Ted Haggard, Paul Bremer, just to name a few.
IMHO, he should interview them on issues they don't want to talk about - in his fair and balanced style. He would be given much credit for trying.
Cheney won't go on O'Reilly same for McCain. He has invited them.
He may have invited the others as well. One does not have to go on his show if they don't want to. Why give the womanizers a forum anyway? I don't really want to see them make excuses for bad behavior.
Blago has been on before so O'Reilly had him back to give an update. Blago didn't want to tell much.
Sorry, but I have to disagree.
Blowhard O'Reilly is a pompous egotistical asse who doesn't know when to shut up.
I liked him a few years ago but he's gotten progressively worse.
His show is me, me, me, me and me!
O'leRilePuss is B O R I N G B O R I N G and B O R I N G !
]
I agree. I think O'Reilly is pompous and not very entertaining. It is the same crap, over and over again. Michael Savage may be a little nutty, but at least the guy is entertaining!
Q - Why doesn't good ol Bill invite others to his (fair and balanced) show: Dick Cheney about "gentle" interrogations of suspects and plans to invade Iraq before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld on similar issues, former senator Larry Craig, Mark Sanford, Ted Haggard, Paul Bremer, just to name a few.
IMHO, he should interview them on issues they don't want to talk about - in his fair and balanced style. He would be given much credit for trying.
O'Reilly has invited those you mentioned on his show. He can't force anyone to be on his show!
]
I agree. I think O'Reilly is pompous and not very entertaining. It is the same crap, over and over again. Michael Savage may be a little nutty, but at least the guy is entertaining!
I think he is one of the best (and fairest) commentators out there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
