I guess the alarmists have finally figured out the credibility of the whole
AGW fanatical community is at stake....too late.
washingtonpost.com (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/09/AR2010030903165.html - broken link)
Quote:
An international group, the InterAcademy Council, will be given complete control to review the rules, procedures and reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said a scientist close to the situation. Recently, several unsettling errors have been found in the climate panel reports issued in 2007.
|
Yes, oh yes, those errors (and others on the way) do indeed undercut that "broad consensus" on AGW. Next up - cherry picked station data.
Quote:
|
The InterAcademy Council is a Netherlands-based organization of the science academies of 15 nations.
|
Now, who in their right mind believes this group could ever be "independent"? This bunch is part and parcel of the AGW fanatical community.
Quote:
|
"It's to be welcomed," said IPCC co-author and Princeton University professor Michael Oppenheimer. "It's a step in the direction of re-establishing the IPCC's credibility with the general public.
|
Reestablish? Some on here would say their credibility is intact.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
