Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:14 PM
 
1,842 posts, read 1,707,205 times
Reputation: 169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Until it went bust..no one complained but Schiff and Roubini.
Those two were called delusional.
Yip
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:14 PM
 
2,104 posts, read 1,441,751 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioIstheBest View Post
Maybe no one was complaining about Bush creating jobs because we had the lowest unemployemnt in history when Bush was president.

And his tax cuts? The federal government took more in in taxes in 2006, 2007 and 2008 than any years in history.


Why do democrats keep blaming Bush for everything? It's been well over a year since he left office.
Clinton handed him a 4.0% unemployment rate.

He muffed the ball, repeatedly. He left it at 7.4. So yeah, I am going to blame him. You're going to have to deal with that.

Then it rose to over 10% (10.1%) under Obama just as it did early in Reagan's term (10.8% being Reagan's worst month), and is now showing a 4/10ths drop since peaking out at 10.1%. Again, very close to what happened with Reagan. It actually took longer for the job market to recover under Reagan, assuming that it continues to drop from this point forward, under Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Arizona
5,407 posts, read 7,791,451 times
Reputation: 1198
The down turn started under Clinton late 90s. But Bush had eight long years to do something about it. Manufacturing jobs have been leaving the country like a sieve during the decade. His whole Iraq obsession was what killled his Presidency and our country in my opinion. Obama so far gets a passing grade in his first year, although hopefully now that he has health care behind him he can focus on this vital issue more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:17 PM
 
140 posts, read 128,978 times
Reputation: 57
Really started with Reagan, escalated with Clinton and went full boogie with Bush.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,423,802 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by bily4 View Post
The down turn started under Clinton late 90s. But Bush had eight long years to do something about it. Manufacturing jobs have been leaving the country like a sieve during the decade. His whole Iraq obsession was what killled his Presidency and our country in my opinion. Obama so far gets a passing grade in his first year, although hopefully now that he has health care behind him he can focus on this vital issue more.
Why not go further back to Clinton for signing NAFTA and allowing those jobs to move within the next decade ?

If I recall the masses were ok with NAFTA because it was going to bring us BETTER jobs..the menial work would go and we'd be freed up to do better, higher paying work.

Sound like the same sad song sung when mfg left in the 70's ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:20 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,465,069 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimrome View Post
Really started with Reagan, escalated with Clinton and went full boogie with Bush.
actually started under carter

carter/reagan/bush1/clinton/bush2/ AND Obama all puppets of brzezinski. and the CFR

the all the same

obama is bush on steriods
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,504,689 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimrome View Post
How were times good? Everything under Bush was built on credit. We had a credit card that we rung up billions of dollars on, but we dont have any money. If Americans had any foresight they would have seen this coming. Things dont get bad overnight, it took us 30 years to destroy this country.

Your thread wasn't about if times were good or credit.

It was about jobs.

Unemployment was at historic lows under Bush.

How many democrats were whining about a lack of jobs under Bush? None.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,526,177 times
Reputation: 18814
The right never complained because Bush was their God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:23 PM
 
2,104 posts, read 1,441,751 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Why not go further back to Clinton for signing NAFTA and allowing those jobs to move within the next decade ?

If I recall the masses were ok with NAFTA because it was going to bring us BETTER jobs..the menial work would go and we'd be freed up to do better, higher paying work.

Sound like the same sad song sung when mfg left in the 70's ?
And we can keep going back to say, early 80s, when Reagan deregged the credit industry and the bubble started to fill. But I do hold Clinton and the others you named responsible as well. It was Clinton who signed off on Graham's piece of garbage, after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2010, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Columbus
4,877 posts, read 4,504,689 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
actually started under carter

carter/reagan/bush1/clinton/bush2/ AND Obama all puppets of brzezinski. and the CFR

the all the same

obama is bush on steriods
Tru Dat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top