U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: North America
19,635 posts, read 12,385,967 times
Reputation: 8278

Advertisements

Awww, really?

Ask the card-carrying socialists: Is Obama one of them? - CNN.com

Ask the card-carrying socialists: Is Obama one of them?

Billy Wharton should be happy.

"Socialized health care" is on its way. The "socialist agenda" is taking over America. And best of all, Barack Obama, a "committed socialist ideologue," is in the Oval Office.

But Wharton, co-chair of the Socialist Party USA, sees no reason to celebrate. He's seen people with bumper stickers and placards that call Obama a socialist, and he has a message for them: Obama isn't a socialist. He's not even a liberal.

"We didn't see a great victory with the election of Barack Obama," Wharton says, " and we certainly didn't see our agenda move from the streets to the White House."

AND, wait for it...the very last line : ""To be honest, the most socialist candidate in the 2008 election was Sarah Palin."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2010, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Texas
380 posts, read 557,043 times
Reputation: 227
Obama has been more of a weak & naive labor union pawn than anything since his election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,309 posts, read 1,098,504 times
Reputation: 1822
Really good point. I also had the same thought when he was elected. In fact the Socialist newspaper from NYC had a cartoon on the cover showing him carving up the poor.

Now since I voted fro him twice and 4 years have passed since this post I have to say he has turned out to be a harsher Republican than many other Presidents and a war hawk to boot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 09:04 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 5,266,403 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepy View Post
Now since I voted fro him twice and 4 years have passed since this post I have to say he has turned out to be a harsher Republican than many other Presidents and a war hawk to boot.
I wouldn't go that far.

The problem is most people in Western countries cannot distinguish liberal social policies from neoliberal economics. Both major parties in the US (and the major parties in Canada, UK, and Australia) embrace neoliberal economics.

The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans really is neoliberalism (Dems) vs. corporatism (GOP).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 10:32 AM
 
3,565 posts, read 2,353,805 times
Reputation: 2729
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
AND, wait for it...the very last line : ""To be honest, the most socialist candidate in the 2008 election was Sarah Palin."
Sarah comes from arguably the most socialist state in the union, but other than that it's hard to see how this statement could be supported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
71,671 posts, read 83,230,487 times
Reputation: 41508
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Awww, really?

Ask the card-carrying socialists: Is Obama one of them? - CNN.com

Ask the card-carrying socialists: Is Obama one of them?

Billy Wharton should be happy.

"Socialized health care" is on its way. The "socialist agenda" is taking over America. And best of all, Barack Obama, a "committed socialist ideologue," is in the Oval Office.

But Wharton, co-chair of the Socialist Party USA, sees no reason to celebrate. He's seen people with bumper stickers and placards that call Obama a socialist, and he has a message for them: Obama isn't a socialist. He's not even a liberal.

"We didn't see a great victory with the election of Barack Obama," Wharton says, " and we certainly didn't see our agenda move from the streets to the White House."

AND, wait for it...the very last line : ""To be honest, the most socialist candidate in the 2008 election was Sarah Palin."
and do you believe in the tooth fairy? Ok, most of us do not really think he is a true socialist: but he does share socialist ideas and would like to go down in history as the Pres who moved up toward a socialistic society. The same for his connecting with Muslim: do I think he is a Muslim? No, I do not, but I do think he is a Muslim sympathizer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 12:26 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 5,266,403 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
and do you believe in the tooth fairy? Ok, most of us do not really think he is a true socialist: but he does share socialist ideas and would like to go down in history as the Pres who moved up toward a socialistic society. The same for his connecting with Muslim: do I think he is a Muslim? No, I do not, but I do think he is a Muslim sympathizer.
If he isn't a socialist, then why do so many right-wing arguments lead with calling him a socialist?

How is being a Muslim sympathizer relevant to anything? Islam is a religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 02:01 PM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,154,079 times
Reputation: 1335
Silly nonsense. Socialism is not a static state. It is a transition between capitalism and communism. The beautiful evil of socialism is that it is designed to slowly and inextricably lead to totalitarianism. Any "piece" of socialism works to spread the virus until it consumes its host. As the State provides more, it necessarily takes more. As it takes more, it has to provide more. Rinse and repeat until the State has consumed everything and all needs of the people must be supplied by the State. When it can not provide enough to the people any more, then the rational of killing off people becomes necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 02:20 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 5,266,403 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by irspow View Post
Silly nonsense. Socialism is not a static state. It is a transition between capitalism and communism. The beautiful evil of socialism is that it is designed to slowly and inextricably lead to totalitarianism. Any "piece" of socialism works to spread the virus until it consumes its host. As the State provides more, it necessarily takes more. As it takes more, it has to provide more. Rinse and repeat until the State has consumed everything and all needs of the people must be supplied by the State. When it can not provide enough to the people any more, then the rational of killing off people becomes necessary.
Dictatorships can't lead to totalitarianism?

Oligarchy can't lead to totalitarianism?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 02:24 PM
 
Location: The ends DO NOT justify the means!!!
4,783 posts, read 3,154,079 times
Reputation: 1335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Dictatorships can't lead to totalitarianism?

Oligarchy can't lead to totalitarianism?

Of course. However, socialism is designed to take any free people and make them choose totalitarianism over freedom voluntarily. It was specifically designed to take advantage of the absolute worst traits of humanity, jealousy, greed, and laziness and use those traits to have humans choose slavery to the State over freedom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top