Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2010, 04:16 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,436,651 times
Reputation: 6465

Advertisements

Hope that our economy comes back strong, Change our Federal Government in thinking that not a thing needs to be done with the PESKY NEGATIVE, EXPENSIVE PROBLEM, WE HAVE WITH ILLEGALS, in OUR COUNTRY. Something needs to be done and soon, when States have to start doing your job, shame on you. Hope that those who lost their homes, will find a glimmer of hope, that they will once again, own a home. Those who have lost jobs, will once again prosper by finding a new job. The new change will be, saying by to Obama, and looking forward to someone, who cares about us little peons, and our Country. Who will not try and change the U.S. as we know her. At least you could joke with Bush, disagree with the man, and he would not come back at ya, AS A FREAKIN BULLY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2012, 05:45 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
Hope that our economy comes back strong, Change our Federal Government in thinking that not a thing needs to be done with the PESKY NEGATIVE, EXPENSIVE PROBLEM, WE HAVE WITH ILLEGALS, in OUR COUNTRY. Something needs to be done and soon, when States have to start doing your job, shame on you. Hope that those who lost their homes, will find a glimmer of hope, that they will once again, own a home. Those who have lost jobs, will once again prosper by finding a new job. The new change will be, saying by to Obama, and looking forward to someone, who cares about us little peons, and our Country. Who will not try and change the U.S. as we know her. At least you could joke with Bush, disagree with the man, and he would not come back at ya, AS A FREAKIN BULLY.


.....and here we are 2 years later and the same lies get repeated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2012, 05:48 PM
 
2,312 posts, read 3,663,793 times
Reputation: 1606
I thought Webster joined the terms hope and change under mediocrity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2013, 02:49 AM
 
7,492 posts, read 11,823,278 times
Reputation: 7394
Yeah we're just surrounded by hope and change...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2013, 03:37 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,237,465 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osito View Post
Yeah we're just surrounded by hope and change...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2013, 06:41 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,113,952 times
Reputation: 9409
Doesn't matter. It's more applicable now than ever.

Barack Obama has forever neutralized the terms "hope" and "change" because 5 years later, we have neither.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2013, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,739,129 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Doesn't matter. It's more applicable now than ever.

Barack Obama has forever neutralized the terms "hope" and "change" because 5 years later, we have neither.
When Reagan was president we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. In Obama's America, no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2013, 09:33 PM
 
8,017 posts, read 5,853,160 times
Reputation: 9682
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuestionThis View Post


Maybe we need to create a new word for Obama-speak, like we did for Clinton.

Clintonese - "oral sex" is not "having sex"; therefore a man who receives oral sex from a woman "did not have sex with that woman".

I like your Clintonese -- Bill is the gift that keeps giving, at least as far as comedy goes (and hopefully NOT STDs).

I've decided to create a verb out of the president's name.

For example, tonight my wife succeeded in nearly starting our gas grill on fire, along with the deck that it sits on. Normally, I would just say what's on my mind, like "Damn, you f**ked that up."

But this is the new, kinder, gentler me, the one who is positively giddy that I'll be getting a free Obamaphone, free Obamacare, and a free ObamaTV (joint venture between Apple & Barry). So trying to make the best of a pretty bad (burned dinner) situation, I said to her:

"Whoa, you Obama'd that up."

The good news is she knew exactly what I meant. The bad news is I had to go pick up Chinese food.

Let's face it -- he's been Obama'ing things up his entire life. Hell, you can even connect the dots all the way back to his mom, who REALLY Obama'd things up when she decided to let a married man park his car in her garage.

And to the OP, yes, the words "Hope" and "Change" should be dropped from the English language until the bad memories of this megalomaniac have disappeared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 11:11 AM
 
Location: USA
31,003 posts, read 22,045,160 times
Reputation: 19061
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuestionThis View Post


Maybe we need to create a new word for Obama-speak, like we did for Clinton.

Clintonese - "oral sex" is not "having sex"; therefore a man who receives oral sex from a woman "did not have sex with that woman".
We can only wish for the Clinton years where the largest news item was his sex life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2014, 12:12 PM
 
13,307 posts, read 7,864,463 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuestionThis View Post


Maybe we need to create a new word for Obama-speak, like we did for Clinton.

Clintonese - "oral sex" is not "having sex"; therefore a man who receives oral sex from a woman "did not have sex with that woman".
Well, it all depends on what "j*zz" is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top