Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-21-2010, 12:32 PM
 
4,459 posts, read 4,208,506 times
Reputation: 648

Advertisements

Tough regulation of derivatives moved through Blanche Lincoln's Agriculture Committee with the surprising support of Republican Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) amid signs that the GOP is softening its opposition to financial regulatory reform.

Lincoln Bill Passes With Republican Support

Wow, of all Republicans, Grassley is the one that doesn't exactly leap out at ya. Maybe he see's the light after his failed attempt on not supporting health care reform...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2010, 02:46 PM
 
6,084 posts, read 6,042,944 times
Reputation: 1916
A definite step in the right direction.

Don't break out the champagne yet though.

We are in an election year and until we have public campaign finance reform, people still got to pay their election bills.

Its a damn good start and we have to monitor this to make sure nothing gets watered down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 07:59 PM
 
6,084 posts, read 6,042,944 times
Reputation: 1916
An interesting take (http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/04/22/senator-blanche-lincolns-derivatives-reform-bill-must-pass-10043/ - broken link) on Blanche's bill.

"The recent charges against Goldman have shaken that belief, just as Senator Lincoln’s bill has Wall Street shaking in its penny loafers. Here is the choice she offers: you can continue with your derivatives, acting against the public interest, or you can be a bank. You cannot be both. Take your choice: blood-sucking vampire squid? Or, serve the public interest. If you go for squid, you lose all public protection. In that case, you go “free market” with all that entails-higher costs of borrowing, 100% downside risk, and prosecution when you lie and deceive. Go ahead and bet against your customers–they will vote with their feet if they do not like that treatment and will sue you when you screw them. Burn down houses and go to jail for arson. Your choice."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top