Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I suspect Pelosi and company slipped all sorts of goodies into the healthcare bill. This is one of the most anti-business administrations I've ever seen.
Come on all you folks on the left that worry about the gov invading your privacy lets hear what you have to say.
Maybe our elected reps should read whats in a bill before voting for it. Or maybe they shouldn't tag it with things they know would never pass otherwise.
This would not be for purchases of goods, only for services. If you employ someone in a nonemployee role, then yes, you would create a 1099 for that person.
I'm still waiting to see how the Lefties are going to come post and attempt to twist this and how long it will take them to start screaming racism, Bush, Tea Party, Palin or Bush.
This would not be for purchases of goods, only for services. If you employ someone in a nonemployee role, then yes, you would create a 1099 for that person.
First of all, who in their right mind will ever obey such a stupid law? You can simply structure the purchases to avoid the $600 cap on services.
The examples are also suggesting that a "used car" for example purchased at $1,000 could be 1099'ed. Did I miss something?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.