Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,827,481 times
Reputation: 6438
Advertisements
This “impossible dilemma” facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device.
Russian Navy atomic experts in these reports state that should Obama choose the “nuclear option” the most viable weapon at his disposal is the United States B83 (Mk-83) strategic thermonuclear bomb having a variable yield (Low Kiloton Range to 1,200 Kilotons) which with its 12 foot length and 18 inch diameter, and weighing just over 2,400 pounds, is readily able to be deployed and detonated by a remote controlled mini-sub.
This article is Full of Win. As we all know, if it's on the internet and it's typed somewhat semi-cohrently, it must be true...and a prudent course of action.
THe only way we can stop this problem, people, is immediate detonation of a thermonuclear device. This is Obama's Katrina. He needs to immediately nuke the **** out if it. Nip it, in the bud, thermonuclearly speaking, of course.
I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss this. The likelyhood of a rig just "blowing up" is practically nil. And, why was the Department of Homeland Security sent, and a SWAT team?
Further, they are now suspecting that the S. Korean ship that sank recently was attacked in a suicide mission by mini-subs.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,827,481 times
Reputation: 6438
Where would North Korea refuel its diesel subs, since they can't make the trip on one tank of gas.
Unless they have nuclear subs, now. Hrmmmmm.. I wonder how they got through the Panama Canal undetected. I bet it was some kind of cloaking device.
I got it!
It was a nuclear submarine loaned to the North Koreans by the USSR that was forgotten about during the economic collapse in the late 80's. Isreal spies detected the submarine en-route but failed to alert the US about it because they were able to blackmail Russia into promising to restrict the supply of arms they are covertly selling to Hamas. Meanwhile, with the US's attention diverted to the oil rig disaster in the Gulf, Pakistani drug lords manage to steal a nuclear weapon which they sold to Al-Queda... Al Queda then faked us out with a Bubba-Queda gasoline and firecrackers SUV in Times Square while simultaneously moving into position on the Western side of the U.S.
This “impossible dilemma” facing Obama is indeed real as the decision he is faced with is either to allow the continuation of this massive oil leak catastrophe to continue for months, or immediately stop it by the only known and proven means possible, the detonation of a thermonuclear device.
Russian Navy atomic experts in these reports state that should Obama choose the “nuclear option” the most viable weapon at his disposal is the United States B83 (Mk-83) strategic thermonuclear bomb having a variable yield (Low Kiloton Range to 1,200 Kilotons) which with its 12 foot length and 18 inch diameter, and weighing just over 2,400 pounds, is readily able to be deployed and detonated by a remote controlled mini-sub.
This article is Full of Win. As we all know, if it's on the internet and it's typed somewhat semi-cohrently, it must be true...and a prudent course of action.
THe only way we can stop this problem, people, is immediate detonation of a thermonuclear device. This is Obama's Katrina. He needs to immediately nuke the **** out if it. Nip it, in the bud, thermonuclearly speaking, of course.
Kind of reminds of the iran's offering technological help with the oil spill. Both are nonsense.
BP, now under federal scrutiny because of its role in the deadly Gulf of Mexico explosion and oil spill, is one of three finalists for a federal award honoring offshore oil companies for "outstanding safety and pollution prevention."
The winner of the award - chosen before the April 20 oil rig incident - was to be announced this coming Monday at a luncheon in Houston. But the U.S. Department of Interior this week postponed the awards ceremony, saying it needs to devote its resources to the ongoing situation resulting from the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion and fire.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
