Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I see yer headed to Az. Are you sure yer gonna like that idea? I wuz there, and any time I asked for street directions the guys I spoke with were armed.
As fer me being sheep well I don't think so, no one I know thinks so, and if they do they might fear to say so. Ya see I sorta live by a code called Mac's Law, and sometimes the people I catch in violation pay a price in terms of pain, then they get arrested, and the law does what ever it does.
Like i said it will be ammusing when the macho mex and the libral whine meet face to face. On that day I will be best friends with the illegal mex.
Specifically the Bill of Rights. This talk of banning Muslims from building mosques, suspending Miranda rights, guilty until proven innocent, individual states making laws based on national security, searching law abiding citizens and demanding to see papers makes me wonder how much of the Constitution they remember.
How dare any state even thinking if doing such a thing. Please let us know which state is trying to do so. Wait, you're certainly not talking about the new Arizona law SB1070? No you can't be, because you are smart enough to know the law never gives the police such abilities. You are smart enough to know that, right?
Specifically the Bill of Rights. This talk of banning Muslims from building mosques, suspending Miranda rights, guilty until proven innocent, individual states making laws based on national security, searching law abiding citizens and demanding to see papers makes me wonder how much of the Constitution they remember.
Where the heck are you getting this from? Not anyone associated with tea parties.
I hate to tell you, but it is the Obama administration that is suggesting that we should not be Mirandizing people suspected of terrorism.
Further, the Arizona law mirrors the Federal law. But since the Federal government does not seem interested in enforcing it, it must necessarily fall to the state to do so. One of the primary reasons for the Federal government is to "provide for the common defense" and "ensure domestic tranquility". If it is not doing that, who will? The state is the next in line.
Finally, immigrants (legal) according to law, must carry their "papers" at all times, and show them on demand. This is not new.
Those involved in the tea party movement know the Constitution better than most. Obviously, you do not know what it says.
Could you speak to who is holding back the Miranda rights from suspected Muslim? Actually I think it is Eric Holder and he sure isn't a Tea Party member.
You're exactly right. These people have selective hearing, and they only "news" they read is Huffington Post, Media Matters, or maybe the New York Times. They watch only MSNBC. They have no clue what's going on, and they always have their information all screwed up!
How could anyone think that it is the "tea party movement" that is suggesting that we not Mirandize citizens? This person clearly is a few bricks short of a full load.
Everyone who voted for and supported the socialist health care bill needs a refresher course in the constitution. "Interstate commerce" *wink wink*
If you would actually read the healthcare bill, you'd realize it's not socialist. Another thing tea baggers need a refresher course in: the word socialist. They have no idea what it means.
If you would actually read the healthcare bill, you'd realize it's not socialist. Another thing tea baggers need a refresher course in: the word socialist. They have no idea what it means.
I don't suppose you would like to defend your statements with an explanation of what socialism and socialists really are. I will wait with bated breath.
Where the heck are you getting this from? Not anyone associated with tea parties.
I hate to tell you, but it is the Obama administration that is suggesting that we should not be Mirandizing people suspected of terrorism.
I know what you are but what am I defense. Obama's support of the Patriotic Act is a complete disregard of the Constitution. Obama is not getting my vote. What's your point, only one person can disregard the Constitution? Doesn't negate the ignorance of the teabaggers. Actually, Obama's administration, knows the Constitution, they just doesn't follow it, whereas the baggers don't know it, hell they can't even spell it.
Quote:
Finally, immigrants (legal) according to law, must carry their "papers" at all times, and show them on demand. This is not new.
So the Arizona law doesn't apply to Americans? I support it than.
Quote:
Those involved in the tea party movement know the Constitution better than most. Obviously, you do not know what it says.
Read it, and learn.
LMFAO
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
