Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2010, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Indiana
2,046 posts, read 1,574,328 times
Reputation: 396

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimw144 View Post
"Obamabagger" that would be the people that put health care, middle class tax cuts, and jobs in a bag then ships them out to Americans who badly need them.
Thanks we were just trying think of a name to call those people.
I think he means beggars you know beg for food stamps free health care.BEGGARS THE ONES WITH THIER HAND OUT WAITING FOR THE MAILMAN TO BRING THEM THIER GOVERNMENT CHECK while they get fat and lazy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2010, 01:21 AM
 
8,624 posts, read 9,088,156 times
Reputation: 2863
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
I use the tem as i present it . A proper way to address a group of people

It's a great term and we should all start using obamabaggers. They all hate the constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 02:32 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,221,813 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by thePR View Post
No. The Tea Party members are called called "Tea Baggers" for obvious reasons. There is no reason behind "Obamabagger" other than your mind's inability to think of something and you trying to flame. But continue, dementor.
Tea bagging is a sexual act there is no reason to use that. Obamabagger just refers to the blind group of socialists who follow him no matter what and hatefully accuse anyone who opposes his policy as racist.
Obamabaggers serve those people nicely as a sexual act is claimed to fit the tea party members.
Seems fair if one side can clarify everyone who opposes Obama as a racist and people committing a sexual act there should be a name for those that blindly support the countries move to socialism.
Obamabaggers fit them well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 04:37 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,169 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Tea bagging is a sexual act there is no reason to use that. Obamabagger just refers to the blind group of socialists who follow him no matter what and hatefully accuse anyone who opposes his policy as racist.
Obamabaggers serve those people nicely as a sexual act is claimed to fit the tea party members.
Seems fair if one side can clarify everyone who opposes Obama as a racist and people committing a sexual act there should be a name for those that blindly support the countries move to socialism.
Obamabaggers fit them well
Can you define "Socialism"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 04:44 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,670,273 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by gysmo View Post
I think he means beggars you know beg for food stamps free health care.BEGGARS THE ONES WITH THIER HAND OUT WAITING FOR THE MAILMAN TO BRING THEM THIER GOVERNMENT CHECK while they get fat and lazy
I guess he is bad at spelling correctly then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,221,813 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
Can you define "Socialism"?
I define it as those who favor redistrubtion of wealth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 05:10 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,169 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
I define it as those who favor redistrubtion of wealth
So, then, you believe that corporations should be allowed to run rampant and milk the public dry with no oversight?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,221,813 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
So, then, you believe that corporations should be allowed to run rampant and milk the public dry with no oversight?
I believe people who believe in redistribution of wealth are socialist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Say-Town! Texas
968 posts, read 2,624,265 times
Reputation: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Pakistan and Nigeria are in the middle east? Now I always thought Pittsburgh was as well, but you've got me beat.

As for the heart of the post, it is just to silly to accord a serious response.

On second thought,

Yeah, they were so scared of Bush that they decided to kill about 4,000 or so U.S. troops, in Iraq alone.

if they weren't afraid why didn't they take the attack to US soil?

He scared the hell out of Richard Reid!
this failed attack was the clincher that lead to the increased surveilance security measures taken for bombs, and not just hijackers, most of which are still in place today and protecting us.

He scared the hell out Hasan Akbar
that was on the other side of the world, we're talking about protecting our side of the pond. attacks on military bases across the world are going to happen, but he got his.

He scared the hell out the crew that murdered Daniel Pearl
again across the world, we're talking about the 50 states (not military bases, not journalists who risk their lives).

He scared the hell our the Egyptian gunman who fired on the El Al ticket counter at LAX.
this shooter had a problem with the Israeli airline after heghtened security measures were taken by that airline, the attack was aimed at the israeli airline workers not america.

He scared the hell out the crew that bombed the American housing compound in Saudi Arabia.
again across the pond the military is fighting these attacks every day, your list is shrinking

He scared the hell our of Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar.
really? you're using a kid who ran some fellow students over and then drove his butt ot the police station and turned himself in? heh, ok...

He scared the hell our of Omeed Aziz Popal
the police commented that there was no terrorism involved in this incident. muslims can go crazy just like white people.

And that was just till 2006.
hmmm, well i see no attacks that osama bin laden or any terroist group could claim as their own

And of course he scared all the failed plotters listed below:

The 2003 plot by Iyman Faris to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge in New York City
why yes he did, or at least the FBI did, scared him into becoming a double agent.

The 2004 Financial buildings plot which targeted the International Monetary Fund and World Bank buildings in Washington, DC, the New York Stock Exchange and other financial institutions

The 2004 Columbus Shopping Mall Bombing Plot

The 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot which was to involve liquid explosives

The 2006 Sears Tower plot

The 2007 Fort Dix attack plot

The 2007 John F. Kennedy International Airport attack plot
and all these plots failed due to the hard work by our men in women in uniform who protect us every day be it military or law enforcement, we are greatly indebted to their selfless service.
i'm disheartened by the fact that terrorist groups feel that they have the ability to start terrorizing us again. above i showed your examples for what they really were, non terrorist organized plots (except for the shoe-bomber).

now we have failed attempts due to bad wiring jobs and plain dumb luck.

theres a limit to how far luck and divine intervention go, until we beef up security again and resume high alert the way bush had, we're going to have these terrorists coming back to american soil such as the underwear bomber and the times square bomb.

Obama needs to get off his "americas bad" horse and get on the "we're the most generous country on earth who gives more in charity than any other nation, and protects the worlds best interests while trying to fuel our economy with the oil we need" horse and bring our country to the top of the food chain again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2010, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,169 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
I believe people who believe in redistribution of wealth are socialist
So, then -

You think that when W borrowed money that the middle class would have to pay back to give tax breaks to the wealthy, it was socialist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top