Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2010, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,131,406 times
Reputation: 13793

Advertisements

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...visible-islam/

Mr. Holder said there are a "variety of reasons" why people commit terror attacks. That can be true, but in these cases there was one reason: radical Islam. The attorney general said you have to look at each case individually. That's fine, but when that is done, one comes face to face with radical Islam every time. He said that of the variety of reasons people might commit terror, "some of them are potentially religious." Yes, like radical Islam. When pressed, what Mr. Holder would finally allow is, "I certainly think that it's possible that people who espouse a radical version of Islam have had an ability to have an impact on people like [Times Square bomber Faisal] Shahzad."
Woohoo - "It's possible" but he will not admit that it is also a freaking provable fact?

No kidding, especially when there is an all too common thread to all our terrorists - Muslims, who have been radicalized to hate others, thru the bastardization of Islam. I'm sure there will be Kool-aid drinkers who will "Bag that!" pathetic display by our nations top law enforcement officer.

This is as pathetic a performance as when he admitted he had not read the AZ immigration law, that he trashed as being rash, possibly even unconstitutional, and would lead to unfair racial profiling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:01 PM
 
45,203 posts, read 26,414,151 times
Reputation: 24961
Default I hope he is read his Miranda rights someday.

Holder is an incompetent horses a** and is only in place to run interference for the Chicago goon squad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:06 PM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,633,112 times
Reputation: 2397
Hopefully he has made the present thug regime look bad enough, even they will want to oust him. One less, and so many more to go....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,200,764 times
Reputation: 33001
Reminds me of the old saying, "He wouldn't say s**t if he had a mouthful."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,131,406 times
Reputation: 13793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Holder is an incompetent horses a** and is only in place to run interference for the Chicago goon squad.
I was disgusted by his pathetic excuse for not having read the AZ immigration bill. "I glanced at it" and he has not "had the chance to interact with people are doing the review", "I'm sure when they put the law in front of me, that i will spend a good evening reading that law".

The comments that Holder and 0bama have made were based on "things I have gleaned by reading newspaper accounts" and watching TV. So he has glanced at the law, spent the time to read a few newspaper articles on the law, but that did not stop him and our president from publicly denouncing the bill and suggesting it was a rash violation of the US Constitution and our civil rights.

When asked when he will have an opinion on the law, holder says "relatively soon", would that be after he has asked his justice department to file a lawsuit challenging the law?

Well 0bama defenders, this one will require a rather large Hefty bag to defend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,323,020 times
Reputation: 2888
He's an incompetent horse's behind. Is it really that hard to say "Radical Islam"? Or to actually read a bill before slamming it as being unconstitutional and even going so far as to say he'd consider court action against it? It's 10 freaking pages long. You'd think this goon would actually READ it before spouting off on it. He needs to be replaced, but I'm sure any replacement Obama would put in would be just as bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:50 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,971,603 times
Reputation: 4555
Yes Wapasha .......There is radical Christianity.........So your point is?

March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of 1992. Michael F.
Griffin was found guilty of Dr. Gunn's murder and was sentenced to life in prison.

August 21, 1993 Dr. George Patterson, was shot and killed in Mobile, Alabama, but it is uncertain whether his death was the direct result of his profession or rather a robbery.[6] [7]

July 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot to death outside of another facility in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings. Hill received a death sentence and was executed September 3, 2003.


December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in two clinic attacks in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi, who prior to his arrest was distributing pamphlets from Human Life International,[8] was arrested and confessed to the killings. He died in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings.

January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, was killed when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result.

October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot to death at his home in Amherst, New York. His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Dr. Slepian's murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.

May 31, 2009: Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed as he served as an usher at his church in Wichita, Kansas.[9]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 12:56 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,971,603 times
Reputation: 4555
I agree what IS so hard about saying radical Christianity?


They support immoral needless wars such as in Iraq.

The man who shot dead two security guards at the Holocaust Memorial had had a website establishing a White Christian Empire in the USA.

The man who shot dead two Unitarians in their church blamed liberals for bringing down the morals of the country.

What so hard about saying this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,131,406 times
Reputation: 13793
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
He's an incompetent horse's behind. Is it really that hard to say "Radical Islam"? Or to actually read a bill before slamming it as being unconstitutional and even going so far as to say he'd consider court action against it? It's 10 freaking pages long. You'd think this goon would actually READ it before spouting off on it. He needs to be replaced, but I'm sure any replacement Obama would put in would be just as bad.
"I scanned it" he says. With only ten pages, reading the entire law does not too much more effort then he put into scanning it, especially when he took time out of his busy day of NOT reading the law, and read a few newspaper articles about the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2010, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,959 posts, read 22,131,406 times
Reputation: 13793
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Yes Wapasha .......There is radical Christianity.........So your point is?
My point is "radical Christianity" is not at war with America, and is not committing, or trying to commit mass murder of American citizens, radical Islamic terrorists are. Oh, and TEA party folks are not the enemy either, as much as so many on the left and within the Democrat Party leadership wish it were so.

Even ALF and ELF, known domestic terrorist groups, are not trying to commit mass murder.

Last edited by Wapasha; 05-16-2010 at 02:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top