Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,690,316 times
Reputation: 14818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
You do understand it was the democrats who filibustered the civil rights act of 1964 including AL gored daddy and former grand wizard of the kkk Byrd
That was then, this is now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,690,316 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDnurse View Post
Thank you for posting the link. I read the article and the statement issued by Rand Paul's campaign:

"I support the Civil Rights Act because I overwhelmingly agree with the intent of the legislation, which was to stop discrimination in the public sphere and halt the abhorrent practice of segregation and Jim Crow laws."

Jim Crow laws encouraged and protected segregation in private spheres. How can this man not see that he is supporting the return of practices that he allegedly abhors?

Now, it appears that he will only speak to a "like minded press". He has already admitted to one poor political decision, now he is on his way to another one. On top of that, he is blaming his opponents for his bad decisions. That's not a very smart way of bringing in supporters into his fold. He can win the Senatorial race in Kentucky, but his chances at a national office are poor.
Well, that is the modus operandi of today's Republican party (see Palin, Sarah).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:14 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,313,154 times
Reputation: 2337
The Civil Rights Act came about as a counter-measure to the Riot Acts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:17 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,591,490 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
He is right, it were those on the right, that doesn't mean they weren't Democrats. It was southern CONSERVATIVE Democrats.


Got news for you, that Woodrow Wilson, signed a law to segregate the military and schools during his term in office. Wilson was a Progressive Democrat. Woodrow Wilson was not a Southern Democrat. He was a Jersey boy. About as north as you can get.

Before that there was no segregation.

The issue of segregation came up early in his presidency when, at an April 1913 cabinet meeting, Albert Burleson, Wilson's Postmaster General, complained about working conditions at the Railway Mail Service. Offices and restrooms became segregated, sometimes by partitions erected between seating for white and African-American employees in Post Office Department offices, lunch rooms, and bathrooms, as well as in the Treasury and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. It also became accepted policy for "Negro" employees of the Postal Service to be reduced in rank or dismissed. And unlike his predecessors Grover Cleveland and Theodore Roosevelt, Wilson accommodated Southern opposition to the re-appointment of an African American to the position of Register of the Treasury and other positions within the federal government. This set the tone for Wilson's attitude to race throughout his presidency, in which the rights of African Americans were sacrificed, for what he felt would be the more important longer term progress of the common good.[5][76]

It would behoove you to know who your really supporting. Democrats are the racist party. Always have been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:23 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,861,563 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
The assumption is that there isn't a sizable number of Americans who wouldn't support a discriminatory business. I gave you the example of Gino's Steaks here is Philly that is doing just fine.
Darn...you seem to have 'forgotten' to answer a simple question...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:24 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,029,506 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
You do understand it was the democrats who filibustered the civil rights act of 1964 including AL gored daddy and former grand wizard of the kkk Byrd
You would like us to forget the 34 Republicans in the House that opposed the Civil Rights Act and the 6 Republican Senators? And, would you like us to also ignore the fact that in 1964 both the majorities in the Senate and the House along with the Presidency were Democrats?

Frankly it takes a lot of balls for the minority party without holding the White House to attempt to rewrite history and claim sole responsibility for the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

The vote count by region:

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)

Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)

Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)

Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)

The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%)

Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%)

Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%)

Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:24 PM
 
Location: NC
191 posts, read 143,870 times
Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
That was then, this is now.

That's what I'm saying. Those laws were needed at that time. That was then, this is now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,861,563 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by ButterBrownBiscuit View Post
There are approximately 350 million people in America, so even if everyone who posts on P&OC boycotts private businesses who are guilty of discrimination, that still leaves a heck of a whole lot of people who may not be as socially conscious or who have no problem with discrimination.

~ButterBrownBiscuit~
You 'forgot' to answer as well...

I thought it was a simple question,perhaps some people aren't looking for an answer???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Astoria, NY
3,052 posts, read 4,303,629 times
Reputation: 2475
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
He was interviewed on by Rachel Maddow this evening. He says he agrees with the Civil Rights Act when it comes to public places but not private ones.

Film at eleven.
I agree. And I'm black and female.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,591,490 times
Reputation: 18521
Wilson did not interfere with the well-established system of Jim Crow and backed the demands of Southern Democrats that their states be left alone to deal with issues of race and black voting without interference from the North, ensuring there would be no challenge to the raft of laws passed to disenfranchise African Americans across the region.[108]
While president of Princeton University, Wilson discouraged blacks from even applying for admission, preferring to keep the peace among white students than have black students admitted.[109]
Many black leaders supported Wilson in the 1912 election. However their rejoicing over Wilson's victory was short-lived as segregationist white Southerners took control of Congress and many executive departments.[4] As President of the United States, Wilson ignored complaints that his cabinet officials had established official segregation in most federal government offices, in some departments for the first time since 1863. New buildings and facilities were built to house black workers separately.[110] "His administration imposed full racial segregation in Washington and hounded from office considerable numbers of black federal employees."[111] Wilson and his cabinet members fired many black Republican office holders in political appointee positions, but also appointed a few black Democrats to such posts.
W. E. B. Du Bois, a leader of the NAACP, campaigned for Wilson and in 1918 was offered an Army commission in charge of dealing with race relations; DuBois accepted, but he failed his Army physical and did not serve.[112] Wilson drafted hundreds of thousands of blacks into the army, giving them equal pay with whites, but kept them in all-black units with white officers.[113] When a delegation of blacks protested the discriminatory actions, Wilson told them "segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen." In 1914, he told The New York Times, "If the colored people made a mistake in voting for me, they ought to correct it."[114]
Wilson was highly criticized by African Americans for his actions. He was also criticized by such hard-line segregationists as Georgia's Thomas E. Watson, who believed Wilson did not go far enough in restricting black employment in the federal government. The segregation introduced into the federal workplace by the Wilson administration was kept in place by the succeeding presidents and not officially ended until the Truman Administration.[115]
Woodrow Wilson's "History of the American People" explained the Ku Klux Klan of the late 1860s as the natural outgrowth of Reconstruction, a lawless reaction to a lawless period. Wilson noted that the Klan "began to attempt by intimidation what they were not allowed to attempt by the ballot or by any ordered course of public action
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top