Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2010, 02:47 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,051,128 times
Reputation: 10270

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Oh what the hell...

They would much prefer people rely on government for their education,

There was a time when Democrats and Repulicans were advocates of public education, mainly because not many peopler were getting one. As early 1779 little known political philosophers like Thomas Jefferson, concerned about the education of the state of Virginia proposed a three tiered system of PUBLIC education. Weird wouldn't you say?

What liberals believe is that when folks can't:

Afford medical care

Cannot care for themselves in their retirement.

Abuse their children

Monitor the safety of their food.

Then liberals do believe that the government, in the name of society as a hold, has a responsibility to the welfare of its citizens. On this count we plead guilty.
And they're doing a bang up job at it! Keep up the good work!

Perhaps by the end of Obama's term, we'll have 30% unemployment.

Why brag about such a poor record of achievement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2010, 03:43 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,288,689 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
Lets try this again.



What do you consider Right Wing/Conservatives that accept these government programs, or are you in some alternate reality state and truely believe that they DO NOT?
H R 3962 RECORDED VOTE 7-Nov-2009 11:16 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Affordable Health Care for America Act


Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 219 39
Republican 1 176
Independent
TOTALS 220 215

Show me where they accepted anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 03:49 PM
 
6,902 posts, read 7,537,921 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
H R 3962 RECORDED VOTE 7-Nov-2009 11:16 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Affordable Health Care for America Act


Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 219 39
Republican 1 176
Independent
TOTALS 220 215

Show me where they accepted anything?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
If you can answer this question honestly, then we can debate.


1. All of the goverment programs that encompose the services that you listed above (education, health care), Where was personal responsibility when the rightwing conservatives accepted them right along with the liberals?
2. When the Right wing/Conservatives were in the majority and or the President, why didn't they just get rid of them instead of constantly funding them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
Lets try this again.



What do you consider Right Wing/Conservatives that accept these government programs, or are you in some alternate reality state and truely believe that they DO NOT?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
Now where is the answer to question number one. Both you and the OP conveniently jumped over that one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud View Post
so, your saying unemployment insurance, FHA, medicaid/medicare, Financial Aid ect. All of these goverment programs are unconstitutional and NOT ONE SELF RESPECTING RIGHT WING/CONSERVATIVE WILL DARE SPEND OTHER PEOPLES MONEY?


No matter how you try to change the subject of your own thread, the questions are still out there. The questions you REFUSE to answer directly. So here, I will keep posting them until you answer the question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 04:02 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,288,689 times
Reputation: 5194
I just showed you where the Republican vote on health care was 176 to 1 against, I am not sure what else you want. Perhaps what you are really trying to do is divert the discussion away from the liberal philosophy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
If you cannot fabricate a reasonable debate, feel free to engage in name calling and personal attacks.
When posters make as many off the wall assumptions as the OP did, there is noting to debate. Know why, the OP is not interested in debating or the facts, hence it would be a waste of time and anyone with more than two brain cells can figure out that making such ludicrous blanket statements is nothing more than some one trolling. Thanks for playing.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,321 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Part of the problem is once in place they are hard if not impossible to get rid of. Let's suppose for a minute it could be proven that there is a better way than SS, how do you get rid of it? You can't because it's become entrenched.
Social Security is not what YOU probably think it is. It's an Insurance program NOT an investment program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:06 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
The social programs of the left are unconstitutional and unethical. The fact that they are utter and complete failures proves that the founders were right in their assertation that all men are created created equal.

Why are liberals so fast to spend other peoples money?


Why are the NeoConfused so fast to spend other peoples' money building other countries?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:07 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
I just showed you where the Republican vote on health care was 176 to 1 against, I am not sure what else you want. Perhaps what you are really trying to do is divert the discussion away from the liberal philosophy.


Healthcare is a very small part of what you started this thread whining about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:29 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,154,953 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
I just showed you where the Republican vote on health care was 176 to 1 against, I am not sure what else you want. Perhaps what you are really trying to do is divert the discussion away from the liberal philosophy.
They wouldnt have dared vote otherwise, not sure if you've been paying attention to the sorry partisan antics in Congress of late.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 06:47 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Troll around the grounds until you feel at home.

............................. and here's to you, Mrs Robinson, heaven holds a place for those who pray.

It is unfortunate,but true. Many of the characteristics of liberals are incidental, but reflect the true essence of that "faith" which is the supremecy of the federal government at the expense of the individual. As a result, most liberals will, and have, abrogated thier personal responsibility and initiative to the federal government. Thus the citizens of New Orleans killing one another and waiting in the flood water for help, while citizens of Iowa bailed themselves out one year later with a similar disaster. One group has faith in the feds (and thus none in themselves), while another feels as though the individual can achieve without the help or interference of the feds.

By its nature, the "rugged individualism" of America could not have occurred in liberal PC atmosphere. Had liberalism been pervasive at the inception of the nation, we would still be waiting on the east coast for the feds to open up the west for exploration and settling. Certainly not the mindset one needs for civilization to advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top