Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-29-2010, 05:33 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
The military follows the orders that they are given--or they wind up court-martialed and in the news, with people calling them traitors (Ehren Watada ring a bell?)

actually if you read the oath the military takes you would understand what it actually means to the military.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2010, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Ryder View Post
It's not my scenario. I was only pointing out the flaws of someone else's scenario. I seriously doubt many, if any US military would go along but the theoretical situation I responded to made the assumption that joint US/UN forces would be confiscating our weapons. I can only work within the given parameters after all.

Remember, this is only a theoretical discussion. Be sure to note the context of any comments made.
Agreed. This entire line is flawed because US soldiers will not attack their own just because politicians say to. Many if not most soldiers as I have said are private gun owners. I think our elected liars understand this well enough not to push it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 05:37 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by drunk on kool aid View Post
I'm envisioning a reasonable disarming process where owners would be compensated for their firearms and ammo with tax credits at fair market value.

so when will the cops and military be disarmed? you will never be able to disarm the public before you disarm the cops both civilian and federal, remove all foreign goverments and soldiers and disarming the military in its entirety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 05:51 PM
 
4,127 posts, read 5,067,345 times
Reputation: 1621
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Agreed. This entire line is flawed because US soldiers will not attack their own just because politicians say to. Many if not most soldiers as I have said are private gun owners. I think our elected liars understand this well enough not to push it.

Yep. We're on the same page here.
As to our fearless leaders' level of understanding, I think you give them far more credit than I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:19 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,608,184 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
Your guns won't stop a tank.
You and I agree on a lot of things, TK (especially when it comes to to the South and all! LOL), but we part company on this one. What makes you think that the tank drivers will attack their own when it comes to an issue like this?

Hell, you were in the military, would you participate in something like the conficastion of firearms from the public domain? C'mon, now...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
You and I agree on a lot of things, TK (especially when it comes to to the South and all! LOL), but we part company on this one. What makes you think that the tank drivers will attack their own when it comes to an issue like this?

Hell, you were in the military, would you participate in something like the conficastion of firearms from the public domain? C'mon, now...
I would follow the orders I was given, whether I agreed with them or not. I'd gripe about it, and wonder why we didn't just kill them instead of putting our lives at risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
actually if you read the oath the military takes you would understand what it actually means to the military.
I served. I obeyed orders I didn't agree with.

I was completely opposed to serving in Desert Storm--but I did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
but they will protect me from thugs and people who think they can win fights with their hands and feet.

also, tell the afghan rebels of the early 80's that rifles did not stop the soviet invasion which had tanks, choppers and jets in it.

Ah, but if you're reliant on them, you're worse off than people who can ACTUALLY fight. If you're in melee range, hands and feet are quicker than guns, since you still have to move to get it. And that's a wasted movement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,221,236 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
I would follow the orders I was given, whether I agreed with them or not. I'd gripe about it, and wonder why we didn't just kill them instead of putting our lives at risk.
But would they be lawful orders????
I followed orders also, even the ones I didn't agree with. But would I fire upon US civilians who refused to give up their personal property because some asshat in DC says so? Not a chance. In fact I can't think of a single person that I served with that would have.
Looters? Absolutely. But people refusing to hand over lawfully purchased property? For refusing to forfeit a right our founding fathers guaranteed us? Not a chance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2010, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Vero Beach and Detroit
622 posts, read 1,665,486 times
Reputation: 325
NO. I wouldnt give up any of my firearms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top