U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 02-07-2012, 12:09 AM
 
12 posts, read 7,006 times
Reputation: 20
I don't think Portland needs a giant skyline to stand out. Just some bigger buildings in between the 2 bigger bank towers would even it out. Which brings back a memory when the US Bancorp building was being built. I remember using the bus to go to work downtown and each time I crossed Burnside that tower just got taller an taller. I had no idea at that time that a building of that size was even being planned.

But anyway, I think a big part of the problem is that the buildings that are at the forefront of the skyline are mostly boring and stunted 1970's era boxes. I do like that new one with the dark glass that was finished last year and once the federal building is finished with the $200 million makeover, that should make things a bit more interesting. Especially the extra 40 feet for the solar panel on the roof!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 02-07-2012, 10:24 PM
 
5,154 posts, read 5,631,090 times
Reputation: 4655
I think with the whole climate change issue (potential future flooding issues) and being in the Cascadia subduction earthquake zone... It's prolly a good idea to keep Portland just the way it is for now. It might not be a stellar skyline, but it's just-right for where it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-07-2012, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
656 posts, read 290,604 times
Reputation: 286
Is it true that buildings are supposed to be short so as not to block west side views of Mt. Hood?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 09:41 AM
 
Location: the Beaver State
5,372 posts, read 2,960,578 times
Reputation: 2423
Quote:
Originally Posted by turquoise1 View Post
Is it true that buildings are supposed to be short so as not to block west side views of Mt. Hood?
Hardly, although I'm sure that was/is a minority of people's concerns at one point.

They're "short" due to economics and earth quake regulations. There is a solid layer of basalt under Portland that is near impossible to dig through in any economical way. Couple that with Portland's small blocks and buildings just can't be much taller physically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn,NY/Bayonne, NJ
11,980 posts, read 1,963,827 times
Reputation: 2221
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamellr View Post
Hardly, although I'm sure that was/is a minority of people's concerns at one point.

They're "short" due to economics and earth quake regulations. There is a solid layer of basalt under Portland that is near impossible to dig through in any economical way. Couple that with Portland's small blocks and buildings just can't be much taller physically.
The second part with the small blocks and the city wanting to let light get down to the street is the primary reason. The earthquake regulations is true to an extent, it isn't impossible to build taller here, it just isn't cost effective.

I remember the 12 West tower was going to be taller but no one wanted to fork up the money for the earthquake requirements that a building needed to go taller, so they cut it short. Basically what is being built at the SoWa is about as tall as we will build any time soon unless some developer steps up and is really into throwing too much money into a building.

By our FAR standards the tallest building that could be built in Portland which would be over 750ft would be in the Lloyd District because of their ratio and block size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
656 posts, read 290,604 times
Reputation: 286
I see. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 01:22 PM
 
294 posts, read 153,953 times
Reputation: 148
Portland's skyline is a case of quality over quantity. It looks awesome as it is. Putting huge buildings there is like a girl getting implants when she doesn't need them. They will look fake, artificial and superficial, as if Portland is trying to compensate for something.

M'eh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Portland
3,660 posts, read 2,673,966 times
Reputation: 2465
This is my recollection of the way the limitation on building height all went down (yes I was alive and living in Portland then):

After the First National Bank Tower (now the Wells Fargo) was completed and opened (1972), the public weren't happy with the way that it blocked the views of Mt. Hood from the west or the way that it blocked the views of the West Hills from the east. A law/regulation was passed that no building would be taller than it.

Earthquakes may have been a concern for someone, but I don't recall it ever being mentioned publicly as being a factor. It was pure aesthetics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-08-2012, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
656 posts, read 290,604 times
Reputation: 286
EnricoV, maybe I heard something to that effect. Thanks for your insight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 02-13-2012, 02:05 PM
 
157 posts, read 34,222 times
Reputation: 76
Park Avenue tower could have sealed the skyline and give Portland a legitimate skyline. Oh, well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top