U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 10-29-2006, 02:41 PM
 
17 posts, read 58,535 times
Reputation: 22
Default Portland: Owning vs Renting-Price is so different!

I live in Dallas, TX and I'm planning a move out to the Portland area. I've sold an investment property here and thought, hey I'll save capital gains and reinvest in a home in the northwest and then move into it in a couple years. I'll rent it out...only HEY! a home costs $300,000 but would only rent for $1,300 which wouldn't cover costs even with a large downpayment. What gives? Any idea why rental incomes are depressed compared to home costs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 11-03-2006, 06:21 PM
 
295 posts
Reputation: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by curlytop View Post
...only HEY! a home costs $300,000 but would only rent for $1,300 which wouldn't cover costs even with a large downpayment. What gives? Any idea why rental incomes are depressed compared to home costs?
This is a nationwide phenomena, not at all unique to the northwest.

It made sense when home appreciation was high, and interest rates were at historic lows. It doesn't now. But it takes time for the market to adjust to changing conditions. This is why it is widely predicted that rents will rise, and housing prices fall.

The fundamentals are clear: as a nation, we have maxxed out our home equity loans and our credit cards, the home affordability index is now at record lows, and a correction is overdue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-08-2007, 06:34 AM
 
Location: home...finally, home .
7,501 posts, read 9,556,716 times
Reputation: 15270
That is even true in San Francisco with its extremely high housing costs. (a teeny studio would sell for about $500k in any nice area).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-10-2007, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Some where on the pacific coast
185 posts, read 451,718 times
Reputation: 63
Default google search housing bubble

Quote:
Originally Posted by curlytop View Post
I live in Dallas, TX and I'm planning a move out to the Portland area. I've sold an investment property here and thought, hey I'll save capital gains and reinvest in a home in the northwest and then move into it in a couple years. I'll rent it out...only HEY! a home costs $300,000 but would only rent for $1,300 which wouldn't cover costs even with a large downpayment. What gives? Any idea why rental incomes are depressed compared to home costs?

Do a google search for housing bubble and all of your questions will be answered. You can find a lot of good common sense info on this subject and then you can make an informed decision for your self as to when to reinvest in real estate. If it won't have a positive cash flow don't do the deal.

The bottom line is rents are not depressed they are more in line with what local wages will support. On the other hand ownership of housing is not in line with what local wages will support.

Here is some data that will support my position. (source city-data.com)


Estimated median household income in 2005: $42,287 (it was $40,146 in 2000)

Portland $42,287
Oregon: $42,944


Estimated median house/condo value in 2005: $225,900 (it was $154,900 in 2000)
Portland $225,900
Oregon: $201,200


Median gross rent in 2005: $696.

As you can see income has not increased in line with housing values. Its just simple math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-12-2007, 12:15 PM
 
Location: home...finally, home .
7,501 posts, read 9,556,716 times
Reputation: 15270
Default scary rents

In Manhattan, rents can be over $14,000 (that is per month). Can you imagine ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-12-2007, 01:54 PM
 
1,008 posts, read 2,318,193 times
Reputation: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHEWY12 View Post
Do a google search for housing bubble and all of your questions will be answered. You can find a lot of good common sense info on this subject and then you can make an informed decision for your self as to when to reinvest in real estate. If it won't have a positive cash flow don't do the deal.

The bottom line is rents are not depressed they are more in line with what local wages will support. On the other hand ownership of housing is not in line with what local wages will support.

Here is some data that will support my position. (source city-data.com)


Estimated median household income in 2005: $42,287 (it was $40,146 in 2000)

Portland $42,287
Oregon: $42,944


Estimated median house/condo value in 2005: $225,900 (it was $154,900 in 2000)
Portland $225,900
Oregon: $201,200


Median gross rent in 2005: $696.

As you can see income has not increased in line with housing values. Its just simple math.
I work in the financial sector so I've been keeping up with the rising costs. Good info! Unfortunately, Portland is NOT a cheap place to live, at least not now. I would rate Chicago and Portland on par as far as cost of living goes and cheaper than Seattle. Obviously if you're coming from CA or NY Portland is cheaper but still you have to have a good job and make a reasonable income to live in the city. I suggest to start with an apartment and learn the city, figure out if you want to spend the rest of your life there before making a large purchase. That just seems like a more rational option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-12-2007, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Monterey County, CA
3,345 posts, read 4,826,242 times
Reputation: 2707
Isn't this normally the case with residential real estate?

If renters could afford a mortgage payment it would only make sense to buy vs. rent. In both places I've lived this has been the case, highly over priced So. Calif. beach communites and much more affordable Colorado Springs.

We couldn't afford to buy in California so we rented as did and still do many of our friends there. Where as in Colorado the home prices are reasonable so more people buy and rents are lower than a comparable mortgage payment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-15-2007, 02:39 PM
 
73 posts, read 200,096 times
Reputation: 30
Default SELL OR RENT Q's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supernova7 View Post
I work in the financial sector so I've been keeping up with the rising costs. Good info! Unfortunately, Portland is NOT a cheap place to live, at least not now. I would rate Chicago and Portland on par as far as cost of living goes and cheaper than Seattle. Obviously if you're coming from CA or NY Portland is cheaper but still you have to have a good job and make a reasonable income to live in the city. I suggest to start with an apartment and learn the city, figure out if you want to spend the rest of your life there before making a large purchase. That just seems like a more rational option.
Been reading these posts and it's good information. We may be relocating to Portland from CA and I'm not sure if we should sell our house NOW, or rent it out first down here until we decide if we are going to stay in Portland. If we listed that house right now, we could possibly get about $100k out of the house, but who knows what kind of correction is due down the line. 2 years ago, a sale would have increased that number to $160k!!!! It's dropped that much!

So, my question is, if my husband gets a job in Portland, I think we'd plan to rent in Portland first, but should we try and sell our house now, or rent it out for a year and make sure we like Portland (thus giving us an option to come back to a house in SoCA that we'd otherwise be unable to afford). Do we put on market now to try and get more for the sale now, and chance not being able to buy in Los Angeles again, or rent out for a year and try and sell the house later, but lose some equity possibly... if we determine we'd be staying in Portland and need to sell to get the down payment for our next house. We're sooooo confused!!!!

Any views would be welcomed! What would you do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-15-2007, 04:22 PM
 
1,008 posts, read 2,318,193 times
Reputation: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinLA View Post
Been reading these posts and it's good information. We may be relocating to Portland from CA and I'm not sure if we should sell our house NOW, or rent it out first down here until we decide if we are going to stay in Portland. If we listed that house right now, we could possibly get about $100k out of the house, but who knows what kind of correction is due down the line. 2 years ago, a sale would have increased that number to $160k!!!! It's dropped that much!

So, my question is, if my husband gets a job in Portland, I think we'd plan to rent in Portland first, but should we try and sell our house now, or rent it out for a year and make sure we like Portland (thus giving us an option to come back to a house in SoCA that we'd otherwise be unable to afford). Do we put on market now to try and get more for the sale now, and chance not being able to buy in Los Angeles again, or rent out for a year and try and sell the house later, but lose some equity possibly... if we determine we'd be staying in Portland and need to sell to get the down payment for our next house. We're sooooo confused!!!!

Any views would be welcomed! What would you do?
Your post has too many "if's and May's" with no definetes. I would suggest that you visit Portland to see if you like it. If you chose not to visit and move direct than I would "rent" your home in CA. It would be foolish to sell a property and not know where you're going to be living and if in fact you'll be happy there. Too many variables and few absolutes with your situation. Rent your home for 6 months to start. This will give you an opportunity to get a feel for Portland, you should know in your first 3 months whether or not you like the city. Obviously, rent first. Also, see how your husband's job situation pans out. Take it slow and assess the situation throughout your progression.
Good Luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-15-2007, 04:38 PM
 
73 posts, read 200,096 times
Reputation: 30
Thank you, SuperNova... do you get a sense I get ahead of myself? (LOL) I think my fear was we'd lose even more equity in our home if we waited, but in all honesty, how far back could 1-year set us? Great feedback and advice.
Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top