|

04-02-2009, 03:55 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
4 posts, read 2,251 times
Reputation: 11
|
|
Looking for lowest altitude route from Portland to Chicago
I suffered a bad head injury that damaged my ear drums and makes me unable to equalize pressure properly, hence I cannot fly in an airplane, and tolerate pressure changes poorly, i.e. changes in altitude. Does anybody have a suggestion on what would be the lowest altitude route from Portland to Chicago? I hate to have to go all the way south to get across that pesky Continental Divide. Any thoughts greatly appreciated!
|
|

04-02-2009, 04:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oceanside and Chehalem Mtns.
440 posts, read 298,745 times
Reputation: 223
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by groundhugger
I suffered a bad head injury that damaged my ear drums and makes me unable to equalize pressure properly, hence I cannot fly in an airplane, and tolerate pressure changes poorly, i.e. changes in altitude. Does anybody have a suggestion on what would be the lowest altitude route from Portland to Chicago? I hate to have to go all the way south to get across that pesky Continental Divide. Any thoughts greatly appreciated!
|
I-84 to I-80 then straight to Chicago. You obviously rise to some high elevations like thru Wyoming but there really aren't that many mountain passes where elevation changes rapidly.
|
|

04-02-2009, 04:59 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
4 posts, read 2,251 times
Reputation: 11
|
|
Low altitude route Portland to Chicago
Thanks Dave, as I understand it that reaches 8600 feet, which is more than my ears can handle. Looking for a lower altitude route than that!
|
|

04-02-2009, 05:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain West, native Seattleite
1,443 posts, read 1,065,248 times
Reputation: 385
|
|
|
That's an interesting question. Can't find too much on the Internet about this. But I did discover that Wyoming's highest interstate is only around 6700 feet, not 8600. And you probably want to avoid Coloroado as the highest point on I-70 is over 11,000 feet! My guess is New Mexico might be the lowest, but kind of out of the way.
Last edited by pw72; 04-02-2009 at 05:42 PM..
|
|

04-02-2009, 05:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: oregon
364 posts, read 232,861 times
Reputation: 173
|
|
|
Groundhugger
Look at I-80 and where you can turn off at Rawlins and go around to Casper and then down to 80 you avoid the pass which is 8,000 and will bother most people..This is taking you about 200 miles out of your way but might work..From there on its flat...Isn't the passes going across on 84 rather high too..Only drove it once...
Good luck and do have a good trip....
|
|

04-02-2009, 05:44 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tualatin, OR
400 posts, read 176,679 times
Reputation: 321
|
|
|
Take the Amtrak "Empire Builder" that goes from Seattle <> Chicago. I believe the highest elevation it achieves is through Glacier National Park and that its around 4800 feet. You can start from Portland and pick up the Empire Builder in Spokane if you don't want to drive to Seattle.
Its about as fast as driving and a heck of a lot more scenic. The Empire Builder is probably the most beautiful train ride you can take in the US.
|
|

04-02-2009, 05:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain West, native Seattleite
1,443 posts, read 1,065,248 times
Reputation: 385
|
|
|
Westbound, maybe. Eastbound it gets dark over the Cascades, and there is a short segment through Glacier the next morning, but that is about it. I much prefer the Coast Starlight from LA to Seattle!
BTW, there is some talk of bringing the Pioneer back, from Salt Lake City to Portland. I would definitely be a customer on that route!
Bring back the trains!
|
|

04-02-2009, 06:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tualatin, OR
400 posts, read 176,679 times
Reputation: 321
|
|
|
Most routes seem to be timed for Westbound traffic. At least the Eastbound Empire Builder times it so you can see Glacier NP in the daylight.
We live in LA and my family is in Chicago so my wife and I were able to do the entire length of the Southwest Chief this past year. We went through the Grand Canyon around 5am....complete darkness.
Trains are a great way to travel when you're not in a hurry. And if you want to do it in relative comfort, not cheap either.
|
|

04-02-2009, 09:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
17 posts, read 9,941 times
Reputation: 12
|
|
|
I'll be making the exact opposite trip in a month, I80 to Sacramento, I5 up to Portland. I think the highest elevation is about 3300 feet, although I don't know if you want to go that far out of your way.
|
|

04-02-2009, 09:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oceanside and Chehalem Mtns.
440 posts, read 298,745 times
Reputation: 223
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoastee
Take the Amtrak "Empire Builder" that goes from Seattle <> Chicago. I believe the highest elevation it achieves is through Glacier National Park and that its around 4800 feet. You can start from Portland and pick up the Empire Builder in Spokane if you don't want to drive to Seattle.
Its about as fast as driving and a heck of a lot more scenic. The Empire Builder is probably the most beautiful train ride you can take in the US.
|
That might be a good idea. Trains can't handle steep mountain passes and the lines are designed for long gradual grades.
The empire builder doesn't go over the cascades but instead it goes thru them via a long tunnel.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|