Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will the Jags go 0-16 on 2013-2014?
Yes 7 30.43%
No 16 69.57%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5,281 posts, read 6,585,076 times
Reputation: 4405

Advertisements

I know people say it's too early to tell, but right now, every team in the entire NFL looks head and shoulders better than the Jags. I really can't see them beating ANYONE this season at all, not the RAMs, not the Titans, not the Steelers, no one! Even bad teams look good against the Jags (Oakland looks like an elite team when they played). At this point, when someone plays the Jags it's going down as a guaranteed win in most cases.

My personal opinion, the Jags will go 0-16 like the Detroit Lions did in 2008. Opinions?

 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,406,437 times
Reputation: 2394
I think there is a good chance of it. Maybe they will move to San Antonio after this season
 
Old 10-03-2013, 02:30 PM
 
513 posts, read 695,345 times
Reputation: 367
As bad as they look, and they do look really bad, I doubt it. Not many teams go 0-16, someone they face is bound to have an awful game and give Jac a game or two
 
Old 10-03-2013, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,031,245 times
Reputation: 37337
better than 50/50 chance that they do go winless I think

there's an even better chance they continue to be profitable

there's no chance they move any time soon from their current location
 
Old 10-03-2013, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
They are no where near as bad as the 2008 Detroit Lions. That was the worst team in NFL history.
 
Old 10-03-2013, 10:31 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghengis View Post
better than 50/50 chance that they do go winless I think

there's an even better chance they continue to be profitable

there's no chance they move any time soon from their current location
Are you sure about that?
 
Old 10-04-2013, 12:36 PM
 
Location: The Great West
2,084 posts, read 2,620,497 times
Reputation: 4112
Roethlisberger said the Steelers were the worst team...I wondered if he had seen the Jags yet, lol.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
They are no where near as bad as the 2008 Detroit Lions. That was the worst team in NFL history.
Yeah, I agree. Now if the Jags get to 0-10, I may change my mind. I think it is too early to tell.
 
Old 10-04-2013, 12:39 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,980,650 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghengis View Post
better than 50/50 chance that they do go winless I think

there's an even better chance they continue to be profitable

there's no chance they move any time soon from their current location

That was said about the Cleveland Browns. They were bound to a lease with the city of Cleveland, and we all saw how that worked out.

As for 0-16 for the Jags? Not sure, as even though the Lions did it, it's still hard to do in the NFL. However; the Jags are pretty bad. They were always quite competitive, so I wonder what the Hell happened down there?
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
That was said about the Cleveland Browns. They were bound to a lease with the city of Cleveland, and we all saw how that worked out.

As for 0-16 for the Jags? Not sure, as even though the Lions did it, it's still hard to do in the NFL. However; the Jags are pretty bad. They were always quite competitive, so I wonder what the Hell happened down there?
Jacksonville is so lucky the Los Angeles market keeps on getting in it's own way when it comes to acquiring an NFL franchise, otherwise the Jaguars would have already relocated to Southern California by now.
 
Old 10-04-2013, 01:30 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,980,650 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Jacksonville is so lucky the Los Angeles market keeps on getting in it's own way when it comes to acquiring an NFL franchise, otherwise the Jaguars would have already relocated to Southern California by now.

Yeah there is that, in regards to LA. Plus you have people who have relocated there from all over the country, and have remained loyal to their respective teams. Not to mention that LA inherited teams from elsewhere with the Rams from Cleveland, and the Raiders from Oakland. I think if LA were granted a new expansion team that was exclusive to LA, with their own identity, and not a team from another city, it may be more of a draw.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top