Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2014, 12:47 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,467,858 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

Way better. Under Trestman, their O improved and their D declined. And Peyton was way better than any QB in their stable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2014, 01:07 AM
 
351 posts, read 369,910 times
Reputation: 106
this is the best secondary defense Manning will face in his career....its better than the Belichick's defenses of the Super Bowl championships of 2003 and 2004.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 05:17 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
6,793 posts, read 5,654,595 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rush99 View Post
this is the best secondary defense Manning will face in his career....its better than the Belichick's defenses of the Super Bowl championships of 2003 and 2004.
I think that is debatable. But when you throw in the PED scandal, it no longer is..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 08:20 AM
 
351 posts, read 369,910 times
Reputation: 106
2003 Pats secondary defense were ranked 15th. Allowed 3,232 yards passing
2004 Pats secondary defense were ranked 17th. Allowed 3,400 yards passing

2013 Seahawks secondary defense ranked #1. Allowed 2,752 yards passing

How is this debatable? This is the best secondary passing defense Manning will face in his career.



2003: Cold weather at Foxboro, Mass January 18th Manning 237 yards 1 TD 4 INT's Pats 27 Colts 14
2004: Cold weather at Foxboro, Mass January 16th Manning 238 yards 0 TD 1 INT's Pats 20 Colts 3



2014: Cold weather at the Meadowlands, N.J. Feb. 2nd ????????????????????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 11:01 PM
 
Location: Inland Empire, Calif
2,884 posts, read 5,637,062 times
Reputation: 2803
Quote:
Originally Posted by mco65 View Post
I think that is debatable. But when you throw in the PED scandal, it no longer is..
This comment makes no sense and is completely uncalled for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 11:24 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,325,912 times
Reputation: 3230
Quote:
Originally Posted by adk34 View Post
Manning beat Bears who were the best defensive team that year. He's in a similar situation. Can he beat this Seahawks? I think with the O-line he has, yes he can. But, he looked like he could crumble anytime he's off his rhythm. On the other hand, his receivers and backs look stronger than the ones he had with Colts.
I think the Seahawks defense is better than the Bears defense - not that much better, but a little better in their front, and definitely better in the secondary. But even worse, this Seahawks offense - especially at the QB slot - is much better than the Bears of 2006.

And even then, Manning did not have a particularly great game against the Bears that year. I felt that the MVP was probably Joseph Addai but they gave it to Manning out of respect for his game and the fact that he's arguably the most valuable player on his team. But Manning doesn't win that title without Addai on offense and Dwight Freeney on defense. He's got a good backfield in Denver, and Denver's front line is pretty good, I reckon. But the Denver secondary's nothing compared to Seattle's.

That being said, I think Denver's offense is some kind of explosive - arguably better than the Colts of 2006. The one game in which Seattle looked like they were flat-out beaten was against Indianapolis, and it was due to the fact that Luck took that secondary to school. Peyton's capable of doing the same. I just wonder if Denver's defense can hold Russell Wilson and Beast Mode in check for 4 quarters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 11:27 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,325,912 times
Reputation: 3230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rush99 View Post
this is the best secondary defense Manning will face in his career....its better than the Belichick's defenses of the Super Bowl championships of 2003 and 2004.
I would agree with this, if you're talking about DBs only. Not sure if I'd agree with regard to LBs, but DBs? Yeah, Seattle's as good as it gets. That secondary's got me goin all the way back to the secondary of the 49ers in the late 1980s and the Raiders combination of Lester Hayes and Mike Haynes. They're that good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2014, 05:23 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,365,995 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rush99 View Post
this is the best secondary defense Manning will face in his career....its better than the Belichick's defenses of the Super Bowl championships of 2003 and 2004.
I agree. Manning has never faced a secondary this good. The Hawk defense is exceptionally smart, fast, intense, and relentless. The D of the Bears that year is not even in the conversation.

Last edited by LexusNexus; 01-23-2014 at 05:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2014, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
6,793 posts, read 5,654,595 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nayabone View Post
This comment makes no sense and is completely uncalled for.
uncalled for?, really?
So the Seahawks dbs never tested positive for a banned substance? I am pretty sure I read that somewhere..

As far as my Manning facing the best secondary of his CAREER comments as being debatable. He has played for 14 seasons .. 16x14 plus all the playoff games seems like a debatable comment to me.. unless of course you go back and look at all the secondaries from each of those games and compare to the Seahawks which i wont do. I said it was debatable, not FALSE.. and I did not say I would debate.. just that the comment was in a stretch without knowing all the facts..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top