Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I picked them because the math added up. Flaco, the loss last week, home game, and the desire to make all last weeks drama with Rice history. Just made sense.
Adrian Peterson is a big part of why I picked the Vikings over the Pats. Now I read there is a warrant out for his arrest on suspicion of child abuse. These guys...
Que Rantiquity: "Now sure how anyone could have picked the Vikings."
Adrian Peterson is a big part of why I picked the Vikings over the Pats. Now I read there is a warrant out for his arrest on suspicion of child abuse. These guys...
Que Rantiquity: "Now sure how anyone could have picked the Vikings."
biggest Viking fan on these boards for the past 6 years and I agree with the deactivation and upcoming suspension and I'm less concerned with AP's future career and legacy than his twisted ideas of parental discipline.
That said, I'll stick with the Vikes as these types of things and how the overall play is affected, more times than not don't have the negative impact on the field as most armchair "experts" seem to think they do. You're all about to become more familiar with the names Asiata, McKinnon and Banyard.
Hey, it's not like we've lost Christian Ponder or anything...
biggest Viking fan on these boards for the past 6 years and I agree with the deactivation and upcoming suspension and I'm less concerned with AP's future career and legacy than his twisted ideas of parental discipline.
That said, I'll stick with the Vikes as these types of things and how the overall play is affected, more times than not don't have the negative impact on the field as most armchair "experts" seem to think they do. You're all about to become more familiar with the names Asiata, McKinnon and Banyard.
Hey, it's not like we've lost Christian Ponder or anything...
Like you, I'm sticking with the Vikings. I don't think their defense will look as dominant as it did last week, but they will make some plays. Brady should be able to get some passing yards, but if the Vikes can get in his face a few times it will go a long way toward keeping a lid on that Pats offense. Offensively I think the Vikings will be okay. They are certainly not better without Peterson, but they'll make due.
Steelers at Ravens - Ravens won Dolphins at Buffalo Saints at Browns Lions at Panthers
Falcons at Bengals
Cowboys at Titans
Jaguars at Redskins Patriots at Vikings Cardinals at Giants Seahawks at Chargers
Rams at Buccaneers
Chiefs at Broncos
Jets at Packers Texans at Raiders
Bears at 49ers
Eagles at Colts
I'm sticking with the Vikings because I just straight up despise the Patriots. There, I said it!
Same here. This has been a tough week for the NFL.
I keep expecting to turn on the computer and see that Peyton Manning has been suspended for kicking kittens.
Would still pick the Broncos over KC.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"
