U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who's Going to Win Super Bowl 49 (Feb 1, 2015)
New England Patriots 56 49.56%
Seattle Seahawks 57 50.44%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2015, 05:21 PM
 
1,069 posts, read 555,435 times
Reputation: 1456

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by everwinter View Post
Correct. Heard it on sports talk radio in Milwaukee, among my co-workers etc. I can't recall anybody I knew who thought GB would win.
good to know that you werent disappointed

 
Old 01-25-2015, 06:17 PM
 
Location: GIlbert, AZ
3,022 posts, read 4,525,855 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keep It Simple View Post
I am not a Pat fan, but pulling for them....would like to see Brady get 4....i have no "hate" for Seattle, i actually enjoy watching them play defense....i would much rather see a 13-10 game than a 49-46 game. Pats and Hawk fanbases have earned the right to yap....look at what NE has done over the past 15 yrs, and while the Seahawks success isnt nearly that long, going to back to back SB's isnt something that is done on a regular basis....all that being said, if NE does win, you will get the small % of clueless saying things like "duhhhhh, they cheated"
Actually if they do win, I will draw a deflated football by there 2015 championship to go with the little cameras beside the other 3. Sorry but can't these guys just win with out an outside advantage?

I disagree with you, I think if NE wins, there will be a HUGE percent of the football loving world that dismisses it the latest scandal.
 
Old 01-25-2015, 06:23 PM
 
6,450 posts, read 3,457,518 times
Reputation: 10253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foreverking View Post
Actually if they do win, I will draw a deflated football by there 2015 championship to go with the little cameras beside the other 3. Sorry but can't these guys just win with out an outside advantage?

I disagree with you, I think if NE wins, there will be a HUGE percent of the football loving world that dismisses it the latest scandal.
More comedy for this Patriots fan.

Three cameras by their 3 Super Bowls, all earned years before Spy Gate and when taping was legal and admitted by many teams.

Assuming so much advantage to a soft football when in fact you have no proof it was even deliberate. The "haters" live on assumption. That's too bad it has marred your football experience having a cheating team always cheating to win, and always winning. Love the accusation - they do it all the time. This court of public opinion on the Patriots is full of people I can only feel sorry for.

Last edited by metalmancpa; 01-25-2015 at 06:51 PM..
 
Old 01-25-2015, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
677 posts, read 530,887 times
Reputation: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foreverking View Post
Actually if they do win, I will draw a deflated football by there 2015 championship to go with the little cameras beside the other 3. Sorry but can't these guys just win with out an outside advantage?

I disagree with you, I think if NE wins, there will be a HUGE percent of the football loving world that dismisses it the latest scandal.
Do you know what the great Bill Walsh used to do to gain an advantage?
 
Old 01-26-2015, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
4,322 posts, read 2,259,538 times
Reputation: 1421
I am going with the Seahawks.
 
Old 01-26-2015, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Beacon Falls, CT
368 posts, read 307,999 times
Reputation: 641
Look at the final scores in games New England has given up 100 or more yards on the ground: 27-25 (218), 14-41 (207), 20-33 (191), 51-23 (153), 35-31 (136), 21-26 (130), 17-16 (116), 9-17 (104). With the exception of the Raider game, no other team that failed to reach the triple digits in rushing came within one score.

Look at the final scores in games Seattle has given up 100 or more yards on the ground: 20-24 (190), 23-30 (162), 17-7 (140), 28-22 (135), 31-17 (132), 13-9 (114), 26-28 (102), 21-30 (101). With the exception of the Raider & Bronco game, no other team that failed to reach the triple digits in rushing came within one score.

Eerily similar, no?
 
Old 01-26-2015, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
2,999 posts, read 3,157,029 times
Reputation: 1644
Pats 31 Hawks 10
 
Old 01-26-2015, 12:05 PM
 
Location: SWFL
22,876 posts, read 19,303,600 times
Reputation: 21312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patsfan20 View Post
Pats 31 Hawks 10
Ho, Ho! I like your optimism!
 
Old 01-26-2015, 01:18 PM
 
9,594 posts, read 4,598,726 times
Reputation: 5459
And they both lost to a team that is primarily a running team, The Chiefs.
 
Old 01-26-2015, 02:02 PM
 
1,754 posts, read 2,080,177 times
Reputation: 3664
23-14 sea chickens.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top