Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Who's Going to Win Super Bowl 49 (Feb 1, 2015)
New England Patriots 56 49.56%
Seattle Seahawks 57 50.44%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2015, 10:21 AM
 
19,717 posts, read 10,109,755 times
Reputation: 13074

Advertisements

Originally Posted by Sheldon says BAZINGA
LOL....Wilson competes against the other teams defense, not the QB. With that logic, Kyle Orton must be a better QB than Rodgers, because the Bills beat the Packers this year. I guess Alex Smith is a whole lot better than Brady because KC destroyed NE this year


The Chiefs beat both teams this year.

 
Old 01-20-2015, 10:39 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,938 posts, read 36,935,179 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaIceman View Post
I think you're right, and Earl Thomas has a shoulder separation so it's unlikely he'll be 100% either. That could bode well for the Pats.

Eh, the starting center for the Pats is likely still out. They have no OL depth. Edelman has a hurt hip. That could bode well for Seattle.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Back and Forth FRANCE
2,713 posts, read 3,022,475 times
Reputation: 1483
Wilson has a good game.
Defense has a GREAT game.

Seahawks by 20+.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:45 AM
 
Location: LoS ScAnDaLoUs KiLLa CaLI
1,227 posts, read 1,592,405 times
Reputation: 1195
I have a feeling that it's gonna be a lot like last year. It won't be to the tune of 43-8, but 35-21 Seahawks is totally possible. Defenses win championships, and I like the Kam Chancellor-Rob Gronkowski matchup.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:05 PM
 
2,516 posts, read 5,685,319 times
Reputation: 4672
I hate Seattle but they win this one running away. The Patriots hype machine is in high gear thanks to spanking a team that didn't belong in the playoffs to begin with. I'm talking to you Indy. I love Andrew Luck, but that team is inconsistent, has a terrible D, and is basically Andrew Luck and a bunch of dudes. If the Ravens Secondary had been at least mediocre, they beat NE. But their secondary is banged up and they had to start a guy that isn't good enough for most teams practice squad. I'm saying it was less than mediocre, and downright terrible. That pretty much paved the way for an easy road to the Superbowl for the Pats. Make no mistake, the physicality of the Hawks will make the Patriots look bad. Seattle by 14.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:11 PM
 
2,286 posts, read 2,006,031 times
Reputation: 1149
Yeah, they were picking guys up off random teams' practice squads all year. Then they would get injured, and they'd have to find replacements. I'm really shocked their pass defense was ranked 23rd and not 32nd. I guess Jimmy Smith was in the lineup long enough to make an impact on the rankings, and their defensive line was great enough to hold things down a little bit. I really can't ever remember seeing a worse secondary.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:14 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,266,686 times
Reputation: 5253
all of the Patriots loses and struggles this year have been on the road away away from Foxboro especially with top defenses.


I give the Patriots a better chance if they have faced the Hawks during the regular season like the Packers. Its hard to beat a top team twice in 1 season because you know what to expect and make adjustments from films........Patriots haven't never faced this defense.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:19 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,938 posts, read 36,935,179 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post

I give the Patriots a better chance if they have faced the Hawks during the regular season like the Packers. Its hard to beat a top team twice in 1 season because you know what to expect and make adjustments from films........Patriots haven't never faced this defense.

I think one of the advantages the Pats have is that Seattle hasn't faced the Pats this year. Belichick has a fantastic record against opponents first time they meet.

I still think Seattle wins.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 01:56 PM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,266,686 times
Reputation: 5253
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
I think one of the advantages the Pats have is that Seattle hasn't faced the Pats this year. Belichick has a fantastic record against opponents first time they meet.

I still think Seattle wins.

It didn't work against Green Bay or Kansas City this year.



Patriots haven't face a defense like this since the 2012 Ravens with Ray Lewis and Ed Reed and not even that defense is in the same level as the Seahawks.
 
Old 01-20-2015, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Iowa
14,321 posts, read 14,611,366 times
Reputation: 13763
I think the Pats take this one. They can be fairly balanced and for some reason, I think they watch the GB tape, figure it out and do this. Seattle didn't steam roll the Packers like some predicted.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top