U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
Old 09-13-2015, 02:43 PM
1 posts, read 579 times
Reputation: 18


I agree about the San Antonio/Austin area including corporate bases of both. It mushrooms into the 10 to 12 media market, and that does not even include the cities of Corpus Christi, Laredo, Victoria, and the Rio Grande cities of the Valley or Monterrey, Mexico who would also support a team in San Antonio. The key proposal given by the rich movers and shakers in this area is to build a modern state of the art retractable domed stadium in between San Antonio and Austin like in San Marcos or New Braunfels along with the already proposed rail system and international airport, and maybe call the team the Texas Raiders. It fits, it works, it snaps of Poncho Villa and his raiders reading into Texas or of pirates who were raiding off of Matagorda Bay. When you add in Monterrey, which shop in S.A. All year round, plus the Valley, all of a sudden the media market size explodes into the Top 10 and the corporate bases explode even more. The Alamo Dome is a temporary 3 year venue scheduled for millions of improvements this present year, while that other TOT funded retractable roof stadium is being built between Austin and San Antonio.

Old 09-14-2015, 12:51 AM
Location: Austin
1,795 posts, read 2,577,736 times
Reputation: 1203
Old 09-14-2015, 01:40 AM
Location: Phoenix, AZ
4,863 posts, read 6,389,457 times
Reputation: 5827
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
At least the Oilers and Browns renamed their teams so it wouldn't be so awkward. And it allowed both of those cities the option to use their old names when football returned. Cleveland said yes. Houston said no.
Not quite the same. The Baltimore Ravens were handled an expansion team. The Cleveland Browns were considered to be inactive from '96-'99. A unique situation that I don't think had happened before.
Old 10-24-2015, 08:23 AM
37 posts, read 36,449 times
Reputation: 16
San Antonio Raiders nice ring to it. A sold out Alamodome Raiders(MEN) verses cowboys (BOYS).
Old 10-30-2015, 09:23 PM
Location: SF Bay Area
14,330 posts, read 19,587,033 times
Reputation: 18436
Yes, San Antonio/Austin does seem like a good choice for a team, but not for the Raiders. I'd like to see the Raiders stay in the bay area. If the gentrifying techie element gets behind keeping them in Oakland, it will happen, maybe with a new stadium.
Old 10-31-2015, 04:34 PM
16,541 posts, read 21,034,478 times
Reputation: 48003
I've closed this as there is a thread I've made a sticky that includes a poll, there are umpteen threads on this subject. We're only going to have one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top