U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-04-2016, 07:47 AM
 
Location: God's Country
5,188 posts, read 3,532,825 times
Reputation: 8689

Advertisements

Punt returner returns punt 30 yds. On the next punt, he fair catches. Is the fair catch ignored for purposes of his personal statistics, or is it considered, with the result being two returns for a total of 30 yds., 15 yds. average return?


QB sacked in the pocket, loss of 10 yds. Are these 10 yds. subtracted from his positive passing yardage?


QBR. It seems that completion % is weighted twice? First, it is considered directly, e.g., 25 for 40= 62.5%. But then it's indirectly considered by figuring yds. per attempt, rather than yds. per completion. Yds. per attempt seems redundant. Yds. per completion seems more meaningful, and, as stated above, % of completions is already factored into the equation. Any statistically-minded fans care to weigh in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2016, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
21,442 posts, read 22,000,772 times
Reputation: 33773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Punt returner returns punt 30 yds. On the next punt, he fair catches. Is the fair catch ignored for purposes of his personal statistics, or is it considered, with the result being two returns for a total of 30 yds., 15 yds. average return?


QB sacked in the pocket, loss of 10 yds. Are these 10 yds. subtracted from his positive passing yardage?


QBR. It seems that completion % is weighted twice? First, it is considered directly, e.g., 25 for 40= 62.5%. But then it's indirectly considered by figuring yds. per attempt, rather than yds. per completion. Yds. per attempt seems redundant. Yds. per completion seems more meaningful, and, as stated above, % of completions is already factored into the equation. Any statistically-minded fans care to weigh in?


afaik...

fc's not included in avg

net team ydg. yes, but not QB's indiv stat

I ignore QBR as it is a stat used exclusively be commies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Type 0.7 Kardashev
10,577 posts, read 7,307,623 times
Reputation: 37483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Punt returner returns punt 30 yds. On the next punt, he fair catches. Is the fair catch ignored for purposes of his personal statistics, or is it considered, with the result being two returns for a total of 30 yds., 15 yds. average return?
A far catch is not a punt return. Same deal as when a batter in baseball walks - it's not an at-bat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
QB sacked in the pocket, loss of 10 yds. Are these 10 yds. subtracted from his positive passing yardage?
No. But it is part of the team's net passing performance. So, if a team has one passer who is 10-20 for 150 yards, and is sacked 3x for a total loss of 15 yards, that team's net passing is 135 yards. The team's quarterback has 150 yards passing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
QBR. It seems that completion % is weighted twice? First, it is considered directly, e.g., 25 for 40= 62.5%. But then it's indirectly considered by figuring yds. per attempt, rather than yds. per completion. Yds. per attempt seems redundant. Yds. per completion seems more meaningful, and, as stated above, % of completions is already factored into the equation. Any statistically-minded fans care to weigh in?
The number of completions does not factor into yards per attempt. Yards per attempt is constant regardless of the number of completions. So, no, completion % is not weighted twice.

QB Rating Calculator
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Gulf Coast Texas
28,640 posts, read 15,537,661 times
Reputation: 11492
I don't know if the QBR in the OP is referring to the traditional QB rating, or the ESPN QBR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2016, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Trumbull/Danbury
6,562 posts, read 4,518,770 times
Reputation: 2493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
Punt returner returns punt 30 yds. On the next punt, he fair catches. Is the fair catch ignored for purposes of his personal statistics, or is it considered, with the result being two returns for a total of 30 yds., 15 yds. average return?

Fair Catches are like walks (or hit by pitches, sac flies) in baseball. If a PR has 2 returns for 25 & 50 yards and fair catches the 3rd punt his average will be 25 yards a return. If a batter is 1-2 and gets hit by a pitch and has a sac fly in his final 2 At bats they will finish the game at .500


Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
QB sacked in the pocket, loss of 10 yds. Are these 10 yds. subtracted from his positive passing yardage?

No. Just the team net passing yards. So, if the QB had 100 yards passing with that 10 yard loss on the sac he would have 100 yards passing, but the team as a whole would only have a net of 90 yards passing. IIRC, in college it counts towards the QB's actual rushing total (i.e he has 5 runs for 5 yards + 3 sacks for a total of -10 yards the rushing total would be -5 yards).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvert Hall '62 View Post
QBR. It seems that completion % is weighted twice? First, it is considered directly, e.g., 25 for 40= 62.5%. But then it's indirectly considered by figuring yds. per attempt, rather than yds. per completion. Yds. per attempt seems redundant. Yds. per completion seems more meaningful, and, as stated above, % of completions is already factored into the equation. Any statistically-minded fans care to weigh in?

I don't even try to figure out QBR, so hopefully someone has an answer that actually knows something about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top