U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Here or There
3,965 posts, read 2,520,448 times
Reputation: 1658

Advertisements

They need 3 TDs in the quarter, without allowing Falcons to score. That's not impossible.

 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
2,782 posts, read 2,383,813 times
Reputation: 2634
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz View Post
Yep that 27th ranked defense CLEARLY makes them the better team....along with that 11-5 record

Not to mention an inferior ST unit...

Pats win because they are CLEARLY the better, more complete, more well rounded TEAM...not to mention GOAT at QB and GOAT at head coach..

This reminds me of other SB's where an unstoppable Offense was supposedly going to blow out the team even though the other team had the BETTER DEFENSE

Like Denver vs Seattle in 2013...that one worked out well for Peyton

Pats vs Giants 2007....that one didn't work out too well for the Pats

St Louis vs Pats 2001.....Greatest Show on Turf....couldn't be stopped...until they were

Buffalo vs every team they faced....every version was supposedly unstoppable



Pats 40-Falcons 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by iknowftbll View Post
Who was it who made the 40-16 prediction for the Pats?
bluedevilz of course!
He's been writing for the last 2 weeks that the Falcons do NOT have a defense & the Patriots do.
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:28 PM
Status: "Fill the days." (set 6 days ago)
 
Location: Fredericksburg/Virginia Beach, VA
10,719 posts, read 11,134,746 times
Reputation: 14178
Quote:
Originally Posted by everwinter View Post
bluedevilz of course!
He's been writing for the last 2 weeks that the Falcons do NOT have a defense & the Patriots do.
I can understand liking your team's chances but predicting a blowout is always a good way to look silly.
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:28 PM
 
Location: SF Giants Nation 2010◆2012◆2014
1,040 posts, read 590,389 times
Reputation: 722
Sack!

Another sack!
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:29 PM
 
5,721 posts, read 5,480,904 times
Reputation: 3606
For the first time, Tom Brady looks old and tired.
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: SF Giants Nation 2010◆2012◆2014
1,040 posts, read 590,389 times
Reputation: 722
Ahem, may I remind you guys that he was saying that to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by echo7tango View Post
That's a funny and entertaining meme, everwinter. There are also those who see how strong the Falcons are on both sides of the ball. Although Tom Brady is having yet another great season, and he had the greatest QB season with respect to TDs and INTs, the Falcons will win.

This is reminding me more and more of the 1984 season when Dan Marino obliterated the previous NFL records for TDs with 48 and for passing yards with 5,084 - the previous records were 36 TDs (Blanda 1961, Tittle 1963) and 4,802 yards (Fouts 1981). But the 49ers beat the Dolphins easily, 38-16.

The Falcons will win easily because they are clearly the better team.

Super Bowl 51: 39-20, Falcons over the Patriots
Super Bowl 19: 38-16, 49ers beat the Dolphins


Yep that 27th ranked defense CLEARLY makes them the better team....along with that 11-5 record

Not to mention an inferior ST unit...

Pats win because they are CLEARLY the better, more complete, more well rounded TEAM...not to mention GOAT at QB and GOAT at head coach..

This reminds me of other SB's where an unstoppable Offense was supposedly going to blow out the team even though the other team had the BETTER DEFENSE

Like Denver vs Seattle in 2013...that one worked out well for Peyton

Pats vs Giants 2007....that one didn't work out too well for the Pats

St Louis vs Pats 2001.....Greatest Show on Turf....couldn't be stopped...until they were

Buffalo vs every team they faced....every version was supposedly unstoppable



Pats 40-Falcons 16



Edit. I got your link right here, bluedevilz: SB-LI-- Patriots vs. Falcons-predictions and discussion thread
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Here or There
3,965 posts, read 2,520,448 times
Reputation: 1658
Those idiots on ESPN thought Pats looked old and done on the MNF game they were blown out by the Chiefs a couple of seasons ago. I won't believe NE is done until Belichek is done.
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:38 PM
 
5,721 posts, read 5,480,904 times
Reputation: 3606
Oh ****.
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Two Rivers, Wisconsin
11,734 posts, read 11,578,635 times
Reputation: 12484
Whoa, huge play for Patriots but Falcons just sacked Brady, game could get interesting!
 
Old 02-05-2017, 07:42 PM
 
5,721 posts, read 5,480,904 times
Reputation: 3606
This is not happening. This isn't happening. Somebody tell me this isn't happening.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top