Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2007, 11:58 PM
 
13 posts, read 37,230 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

Just saw an article that TWC and Disney agreed to a deal today so that TWC will add ESPN2 HD later this year. Hooray!

Here's the first part of the article:


NEW YORK, April 4 (Reuters) - Walt Disney Co. (DIS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) reached comprehensive distribution agreements that will include the launch of new Disney high-definition channels on the No. 2 U.S. cable operator.

The two companies said on Wednesday Time Warner Cable will carry sports channels ESPN2 HD and ESPNU later this year. Some systems will also offer Disney Channel on Demand and ESPN Desportes.

Time Warner Cable, which has 13.4 million subscribers, also agreed to carry three new high-definition channels -- ABC Family HD, Disney Channel HD and ESPNEWS HD -- in 2008.

As part of the deal, the two companies extended their retransmission pact for Disney's ABC-owned broadcast television station on Time Warner Cable systems.

Retransmission discussions between cable operators and broadcasters have become strained in recent months as broadcasters started to demand that cable operators pay for the right to carry the 'free-to-air' stations.

Media companies like Disney, which owns broadcasters alongside cable channels and movie studios, typically reach agreements with operators by bartering channel carriage and advertising for retransmission of the broadcast stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2007, 05:30 AM
 
106 posts, read 733,328 times
Reputation: 94
^ Actually, TWC has actually *now added* ESPN2-HD and we should see ESPN-U later this year.

That news bit was enough for me to cancel my upcoming DirecTV installation and just stick with cable. If you bargain on the phone, you can apparently get a great 1-year promo deal to go w/ cable. And it makes "installation" a breeze considering our house is pre-wired for cable.

We're closing on it today!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2007, 06:51 AM
 
693 posts, read 2,760,471 times
Reputation: 320
I personally don't care for ESPN or ESPN2.

I'd love to get National Geographic Channel HD on cable!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2007, 07:06 AM
 
214 posts, read 701,821 times
Reputation: 47
To Rich6896- you can still see the red sox if you have internet access by subscribing to MLB.com.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2007, 08:57 AM
 
22 posts, read 159,819 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
Not shilliing for TWC, but...
I have never had a bad experience, in 9 years, 3 homes.
I live a few miles from the office, so I drive down and talk to them, swap out modems, tuner boxes, etc.
Smooth sailing so far, every time.
Roadrunner has been great, and the handful of times I have needed to call for support, I have done quite well, with very helpful CSR's.
Credit card billing has been smooth.

I can't say the signal is better or worse than satellite, just that it is good enough for me. But I grew up with rooftop antennas, snow, etc. So, promises of improving what I have would not motivate me to change.
My experience thus far with TWC/RR is to fill out their online form for a business representative to call me so I can just find out the price of getting a static IP. The request just went into a black hole. Not important enough for a salesguy to waste his time on I guess. Sadly, there is no other way to get the information. Very old telco style business it seems to me

cheers, Liam
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2007, 11:49 AM
 
Location: North Raleigh
578 posts, read 3,081,017 times
Reputation: 276
My understanding is you cannot get Static IP as a "normal" RoadRunner customer. You have to upgrade to Teleworker Business Class which is at minimum $89/mo and cannot be bundled with normal cable services so you get screwed there, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2007, 03:04 PM
 
22 posts, read 159,819 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by gastric View Post
My understanding is you cannot get Static IP as a "normal" RoadRunner customer. You have to upgrade to Teleworker Business Class which is at minimum $89/mo and cannot be bundled with normal cable services so you get screwed there, too.
Sure, I worked that out and don't have a problem with that part of it. My issue is that *nowhere* in the business part of the TWC/RR site does it give prices, or plans. Just says to ask for a sales droid to contact you - which I did, and they didn't :-( $89 a month would be fine. Right now I pay $99 a month for 8 Static IPs on DSL.

Cheers, Liam
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 02:41 AM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,532,401 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by krupina View Post
Just saw an article that TWC and Disney agreed to a deal today so that TWC will add ESPN2 HD later this year. Hooray!

...

Retransmission discussions between cable operators and broadcasters have become strained in recent months as broadcasters started to demand that cable operators pay for the right to carry the 'free-to-air' stations.

Media companies like Disney, which owns broadcasters alongside cable channels and movie studios, typically reach agreements with operators by bartering channel carriage and advertising for retransmission of the broadcast stations.
By 1966, more than 1 million homes out of 60 million received cable, and more than 1,200 systems were operating. The FCC decided to limit and regulate the manner in which CATV competes with the basic off-air television broadcast service. The cable system must carry the signals of all local stations. Since the rules were specified by the government, no money changed hands in either direction.

By 1992 the laws of 1966 that were designed to protect now seemed problematic in light of the money that cable networks were collecting in fees. New shows that went straight to syndication, like Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987-1994) were generating large income streams for cable networks.

The FCC changed the law so that a local station had to grant permission to re-transmit a broadcast channel. Initially the cable companies announced that they were not about to pay for "free television" so the media companies secured things besides cash. For instance in 1993 the cable companies could only air ABC if they agreed to air ESPN2 (a start up standard definition network) as well. Often cable companies would agree to purchase advertising time to secure permission.

But the FCC still required cable companies to leave local channels unencrypted so they could be viewed without renting a set top box. The TV's manufactured after about 2005 were required to have QAM tuners so they could handle the new digital cable systems. In October 2012 the FCC caved in and permitted the cable companies to encrypt local broadcast channels as well, so that a box was required to watch even local news and PBS.

In the last few years, media companies have decided to demand cash for permission, and so far most of the cable companies have complied. But one rumor is that cable companies will soon refuse to carry broadcast channels in an effort to reduce costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 06:17 AM
 
1,527 posts, read 1,479,878 times
Reputation: 1487
What bothers me is that TWC must take all Disney channels to get any.

This really screws those of us who have no interest in sports and must pay the outrageous charges the cable company must buy.

If all sports were on a separate tier, a lot of money can be saved by many TWC subscribers.

TWC has been much more reliable than U-Verse and you do not have to own satellite receivers and have to maintain them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2017, 10:13 AM
 
2,819 posts, read 2,582,084 times
Reputation: 3554
DirectTV all the way. We dropped TWC years ago and have never looked back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top