Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I cannot see a scenario where the judge meets with a political party to explain his ruling. That's just crazy talk. I have a couple of acquaintances who are judges and just don't see that occurring. Stop spreading rumors.
I cannot see a scenario where the judge meets with a political party to explain his ruling. That's just crazy talk. I have a couple of acquaintances who are judges and just don't see that occurring. Stop spreading rumors.
It does sound crazy. I also don't know why he would meet with the Durham GOP, an organization that has zero power and influence in the progressive-dominated Durham .
I don't think it's a real thing, then. It doesn't seem like something a judge would do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppydog
I cannot see a scenario where the judge meets with a political party to explain his ruling. That's just crazy talk. I have a couple of acquaintances who are judges and just don't see that occurring. Stop spreading rumors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppydog
It's certainly not on the Durham GOP's events listing on their website which does have a couple of other March events on there. Methinks, "nah".
How many times do you need to say the same thing, all within 2 hours ???
It is on a GOP volunteer's Facebook page and I will work to confirm it and
report back, despite the fact that NorasMom thinks that means I am "all worked up"
How many times do you need to say the same thing, all within 2 hours ???
It is on a GOP volunteer's Facebook page and I will work to confirm it and
report back, despite the fact that NorasMom thinks that means I am "all worked up"
I do think you're all worked up, but appreciate your efforts to confirm it, lol.
It seems really inappropriate...I'd also think it were inappropriate for a judge to appear before a dem group to (apologize) explain a decision. I dunno. Maybe it's no different than issuing a written opinion, technically, but it seems just...weird.
I guess you could keep trying to find a reason to fight online, though.
Nothing to fight about.
I have an opinion and others with
differing ones are welcome to chime in or
ignore the thread. Gotta love free speech.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
