Quote:
Originally Posted by I'minformed2
NC Paddler; Apex is a town, it is also a suburb. How is this something that is debatable? Most "suburbs" are "towns". I'm not seeing the conflict there?
|
It's not a big deal . . . it's just semantics.
Apex, as formally and legally defined as a "town" (i.e., The Town of Apex), contains "suburbs" (subdivision X, Y, and Z), among other things. It also contains some land and sparsely populated roads . . . but Apex, as an entity, also contains a "town" (i.e., downtown Apex).
The downtown area of Apex (what I consider the "town" -- again not in the legal definition) is *not* a suburb . . . you would say that you live "in town".
A suburb, by my estimation (and as defined in the dictionary entry I posted), is outside of the town (again, not in the legal sense of the word "town", but in the common sense use of the word).
So back to the OP question . . . in town (again not in the legal definition of the word) is where you would find a "town square". You would typically *not* find a town square in a suburb (X, Y, or Z subdivision).
And yes, the "Town of Apex" (in the legal sense of the word) *is* a suburb of Raleigh . . . but that's not the way in which I was using the word.
Enough said on that . . . no one really cares, I'm sure.