Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2012, 11:57 PM
 
Location: Columbia, MD
553 posts, read 1,706,521 times
Reputation: 400

Advertisements

The bottom is in. The issue is prices won't be going anywhere in dollars, although they will appreciate in nominal dollars.

The market is being held up through the election cycle. The next recession is baked in, and it will not be pretty. Should make for great headlines after Christmas and into January. The rich, really rich, super rich, and mega rich are all cashing in their chips, once they've liquidated their assets then us peons will be left to find musical chairs is over and we lost. There is some serious turmoil right now in places like the Caymans and Bermuda where liquidation is happening quickly and behind closed doors.

Folks who have fixed, low rate mortgages will fare OK. The idea of a good return on investment is dead for the rest of the decade, it is all about preservation of wealth. Home prices in good neighborhoods in mega-metro areas will be OK. Good means well educated, insulated from poverty and with strong public schools.

Prices can't rise in dollars because it's a catch 22, as most pointed out. Improvement in employment will push up interest rates, which will hold down price appreciation. Rates remaining low will indicate low to stagnant growth, meaning sales will stay sluggish nationally.

Leaving your cash in your mattress is not a good idea, but accumulating wealth in your house (provided you live in a good neighborhood in a mega metro area in a pocket of prosperity, eg SF Bay) is not a bad one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2012, 12:32 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,227,271 times
Reputation: 9845
Different regions are going to hit the bottom at different times, just as different regions hit the peak at different time. For example, Sacramento, CA hit the housing peak around mid 2006 and then had a rapid decline in prices; the change happened rather suddenly, like someone just flipped a switch. Just 70 miles away, San Francisco's prices was still raising until the crash in 2008. But even within SF, different neighborhoods crashed at different times. Bayview started crashing around 2007 while Noe Valley was still soaring like gang buster.

In San Francisco, the bottom was late 2010/ early 2011. While Sacramento is still trying to find a bottom (maybe it's here already but we won't know until after the fact).

The key is: last to fall, first to rise; and first to fall, last to rise. If your region is among the first to pop the bubble, likely your region will be among the last to recover; and vice versa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top