Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2013, 11:44 AM
 
505 posts, read 765,210 times
Reputation: 512

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NekkidFish View Post
Sorry guys ... I must not have worded it right, because I didn't get my point/question across right.

The point of the post was would you rather put down the $200K knowing it makes you a stronger buyer, and you'll have a smaller mortgage payment?

Or, put down a much smaller down payment, knowing that you might get passed over several times before finding a house you like ... but you will put the extra $$$ in the bank should the market go down and you're in a screwed situation on the house?

For those that don't know the market out here (as well as other areas of the country) there were people that bought houses out here in 2006 for $800K and now they barely appraise for $500K. A lot of those folks make their mortgage payments and stay because they have no choice, and they put down a huge chunk of cash to get into their homes. As well as, they might be locked into higher interest rates, with no way to lower their payment. And, with the new law ... unless your mortgage was with Freddie or Fannie, you cannot refinance to try and get your payment down, because these are considered jumbo loans.

I'm just trying to figure out from a financial point of view, which one is the better strategy.

HUGz! Jules
It depends...

Are you getting the same interest rate/points with 20% down vs. less? If not, is the difference worth it to you to have more flexibility with your money? I can think of a lot of reasons it might be worth paying a small amount of PMI to have the flexibility of $100k sitting in the bank.

How competitive is the market? In some places 5% down with a pre-approval from a reputable bank may be considered just as strong as 20% down.

Is the seller is concerned about the ability to close of someone with a smaller downpayment? You could provide proof that you have more funds but that you are choosing to make a smaller downpayment for strategic reasons. In other words, you may not get "passed over" on places or have to offer more if you choose to go with the lower down payment if you can show you have more than enough money in the bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2013, 08:00 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,727 posts, read 26,806,307 times
Reputation: 24790
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamrock847 View Post
Is the seller is concerned about the ability to close of someone with a smaller downpayment? You could provide proof that you have more funds but that you are choosing to make a smaller downpayment for strategic reasons.
No seller today is going to take that risk. This is 2013, not the middle of the housing bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top