Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-14-2014, 02:55 PM
 
5 posts, read 9,923 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Hi everyone. I lived in WA state, we purchased a single family house last month. Our original agreement with our agent is if he can give us 1.5% rebate we will have him sell our old condo. He gave us 1% rebate eventually because the seller only gave him 2.5% not 3%. For some other reasons we are not happy with him and doesn't want him to sell the condo for us. My question is does the original verbal contract binding? Will he be able to sue us if we hire another agent to sell the condo for us? What is the worse case? Thanks a lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2014, 07:47 PM
 
8,544 posts, read 12,311,430 times
Reputation: 16448
Quote:
Originally Posted by lj84 View Post
What is the worse case?
Worst case is probably that bad karma will catch up to you for going back on your word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2014, 08:54 PM
 
988 posts, read 1,733,603 times
Reputation: 1078
The verbal agreement you had is probably not binding; a listing agreement needs to be in writing to be enforceable, at least in the states in which I practice. Highly doubt that WA would be any different in that regard. That being said, you get what you pay for, and any agent that is willing to give up such a significant chunk of their salary to you is probably not a good agent, and you'll end up getting poor service.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 01:11 AM
 
5 posts, read 9,923 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
Worst case is probably that bad karma will catch up to you for going back on your word.
Please take back your words if you know what had happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 01:12 AM
 
5 posts, read 9,923 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by berniekosar19 View Post
The verbal agreement you had is probably not binding; a listing agreement needs to be in writing to be enforceable, at least in the states in which I practice. Highly doubt that WA would be any different in that regard. That being said, you get what you pay for, and any agent that is willing to give up such a significant chunk of their salary to you is probably not a good agent, and you'll end up getting poor service.
Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
5,663 posts, read 10,694,828 times
Reputation: 6945
You didn't mention whether or not the original agreement included any discussion regarding 3%. I think that aspect of your question is relevant. Also, without knowing the rest of the story, I have to say that the fair thing, in my view, would be for you to give the agent back the rebate so he ends up with 2.5% and you end up with nothing since you don't want to go thru with the second part of your deal. In other words, get back to where you all would have been had no agreement existed.

Since I am not an attorney, I can't comment on the legal aspect of what you agreed to do but I can tell you that you should always, always, always get all agreements written down on paper and signed and dated by all parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 08:59 AM
 
8,544 posts, read 12,311,430 times
Reputation: 16448
Quote:
Originally Posted by lj84 View Post
Please take back your words if you know what had happened.
I can only comment on what you disclose.

A good suggestion was offered by bbronston--give back the amount of the rebate and go on your merry way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 07:59 PM
 
5 posts, read 9,923 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbronston View Post
You didn't mention whether or not the original agreement included any discussion regarding 3%. I think that aspect of your question is relevant. Also, without knowing the rest of the story, I have to say that the fair thing, in my view, would be for you to give the agent back the rebate so he ends up with 2.5% and you end up with nothing since you don't want to go thru with the second part of your deal. In other words, get back to where you all would have been had no agreement existed.

Since I am not an attorney, I can't comment on the legal aspect of what you agreed to do but I can tell you that you should always, always, always get all agreements written down on paper and signed and dated by all parties.
Thanks. Lesson learned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2014, 08:15 PM
 
5 posts, read 9,923 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
I can only comment on what you disclose.

A good suggestion was offered by bbronston--give back the amount of the rebate and go on your merry way.
Ok, let me explain a little bit. First of all, we didn't take any advantage from him. He gives 1% to all of his clients. That's how we found him. Our original agreement was if he could give us that additional .5% we will have him sell our condo. But we didn't get it. Secondly, we contacted him right after we moved out of the condo for pricing strategy. We purchased the condo for 300K and based on our research it worths about 240-250k now. However, he refused to list it that high. He said we should list at 190k and waited for people to bid up the price to 210k. Excuse me?! We contacted other two agents later and both of them thought our price was reasonable. That made us wondering this agent just want the house to be sold quick without any effort because we agreed for a flat selling commission. There are more things we were not happy about him but I don't want to disclose too much personal information here. Lastly, I just wanna say Don't judge! What you said made me very uncomfortable!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 05:05 AM
 
8,544 posts, read 12,311,430 times
Reputation: 16448
Quote:
Originally Posted by lj84 View Post
Ok, let me explain a little bit. First of all, we didn't take any advantage from him. He gives 1% to all of his clients. That's how we found him. Our original agreement was if he could give us that additional .5% we will have him sell our condo. But we didn't get it. Secondly, we contacted him right after we moved out of the condo for pricing strategy. We purchased the condo for 300K and based on our research it worths about 240-250k now. However, he refused to list it that high. He said we should list at 190k and waited for people to bid up the price to 210k. Excuse me?! We contacted other two agents later and both of them thought our price was reasonable. That made us wondering this agent just want the house to be sold quick without any effort because we agreed for a flat selling commission. There are more things we were not happy about him but I don't want to disclose too much personal information here. Lastly, I just wanna say Don't judge! What you said made me very uncomfortable!
Okay. This additional information casts a whole new light on the subject. Since he operates as a discount agent, the onus was on him to make clear what the rebate amount would be if the buyer agent's commission was less than 3%--and he should have put it in writing. Surely he has encountered that situation before. So...since he did not live up to your verbal agreement, I feel that you are free--both legally and ethically--to seek out the services of another agent, without returning any of the rebate amount. I hope you now feel better. (Sorry, but your original explanation just didn't sit right with me. This one was much better--thanks for the clarification.)

And I agree that it sounds like he's just looking for an easy, quick commission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top