Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2015, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Austin
7,244 posts, read 21,792,163 times
Reputation: 10014

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by amukherj View Post
I am wondering if I should ask the sellers to compensate for that in the price as although square footage should not be the only thing, but it is definitely something one can not ignore. I would be interested to know what your advice is on this. Thanks again.
Did the sellers remove a room from when you saw the house and when it was measured? If not, it's the exact same house you contracted and you compared that house, location, floorplan, and features to other houses you saw and you deemed this house to be the best, right?

Your offer was based on seeing comparable houses that didn't match up to what you liked about this house. You don't like it just because of a sqft number. You like the house. The sales price should equate to how you compare this house to the others. No one buys a house dollar per sqft as each house has different quality of updates, upgrades, and other features within.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2015, 11:57 AM
 
18 posts, read 34,912 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by harlowvart View Post
What would you have offered knowing the true square footage?
I would have not offered more than my initial offer, which was 407K. So there would have been a difference of around 7-8 K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 11:59 AM
 
524 posts, read 573,940 times
Reputation: 1093
Wait until the appraisers sq. ft. comes in to know exactly what you are dealing with. A 500 sq. ft. discrepancy should show up. Once you know which number is correct, the advertising or the county, you have to figure out why the discrepancy exists. If the 500 sq. ft. is there, then it could indicate unpermitted work, which is a problem. Or it could indicate there was a recording error at the county. If the 500 sq. ft. isn't there then, yes you should renegotiated with this new information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 12:05 PM
 
404 posts, read 764,777 times
Reputation: 914
Quote:
Originally Posted by amukherj View Post
I would have not offered more than my initial offer, which was 407K. So there would have been a difference of around 7-8 K.
I know it's your first home, but I really don't think you should sweat this.

If your post above is accurate, you're only valuing those extra 500 square feet at $16 per square foot - not enough to risk a potential deal falling through.

Do you really like or love the house? Can you comfortably afford it? Will it suit your needs for the foreseeable future? Is it a nice area?

If you answered yes to those questions, don't spend another moment worrying about the 500 square feet (well, to be prudent you should determine whether there is possible un-permitted work - beyond that, see what the appraiser measures, and be happy... )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 02:12 PM
 
5,048 posts, read 9,609,950 times
Reputation: 4181
The first acceptance of your offer is just that...the first. After due diligence there can be more dickering depending on what you find. As far as sq footage, my question is how are the comparable homes priced. Or is everyone's square footage messed up.

I know some people get off track measuring when the first floor is wider than the second floor. Or a listing agent just copies the previous agent's dimensions assuming they are correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 03:11 PM
 
13,130 posts, read 20,951,536 times
Reputation: 21405
And what if the appraiser's square footage comes back in between the two? Does the square footage really matter more than if the house as a whole is what you want? You probably thought nothing of the square footage when looking at the actual property (or you would have been carrying a measuring tape) and since you liked it based on the assumption the square footage was one amount, why does it now matter that it's a lesser amount? I know you said you would have offered less, but in your gut, do you really think that would have been the case?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Northern Maine
10,428 posts, read 18,666,175 times
Reputation: 11563
It is possible that the owner added a room and county officials have not gotten around to updating their tax cards. You may be certain that if you complain they will boost the taxes on that property. Your move, amukherj.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 05:49 PM
 
11,554 posts, read 53,137,981 times
Reputation: 16348
Quote:
Originally Posted by amukherj View Post
Thank you to all for your replies. Really helps someone like me getting his first home. In the sellers disclosure the seller has mentioned that the square footage was reported as "measurement from contractor". If there is a considerable difference in the sq. ft reported by the appraiser and the sq. ft put by seller, it would feel like I will be paying based off a false advertisement for some space which does not really exist. I am wondering if I should ask the sellers to compensate for that in the price as although square footage should not be the only thing, but it is definitely something one can not ignore. I would be interested to know what your advice is on this. Thanks again.
As others have noted, "square footage" is measured in different ways for different purposes.

The "contractor" deals in square footage due to plans and materials for the structure.

The "assessor" deals in taxable square footage; ie, some spaces that the "contractor" built may not be included by the assessor due to their standards. Such discrepancies commonly occur with sunrooms, porches, utility areas, basements, breezeways, etc.

What you need to focus on is the overall functionality of the house that is under consideration. If it meets your requirements and the amenities and intangibles are attractive to you, then that's what establishes value. Square footage, however measured, is only a small part of that overall valuation as a buyer.

IMO, you should be happy that the assessor is taxing fewer square feet than the useable square footage of the house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 05:53 PM
 
587 posts, read 915,030 times
Reputation: 812
Quote:
Originally Posted by amukherj View Post
I would have not offered more than my initial offer, which was 407K. So there would have been a difference of around 7-8 K.
It's not a huge amount in the scheme of things. Maybe you would have lost out to someone else if you had made the lower bid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2015, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,220,668 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by amukherj View Post
Looks like the general thought towards this is that I should not worry about the square footage too much, if the area is good enough then I should proceed with the home. I love the home and would like to do that but since this is my first home, I am just trying to do as much research as possible and get perspectives from all of you so that the buyers remorse could be minimized. Your posts have been really helpful. Thank you to all.
Did you see the house? Did it suit your needs? If so then everything should be fine.

Maybe the house is larger and the county has it wrong, you could always correct them and pay higher taxes if that makes you feel better!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top