Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2015, 09:05 PM
 
3,826 posts, read 5,806,501 times
Reputation: 2401

Advertisements

Sometimes you need a majority of homeowners to agree to change rules regarding no renting for first 1-2 years, so if you have many renters now you might not get what you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2015, 11:08 PM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,840,537 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by el1zabeth View Post
Hi All,
I am on an Hoa board and would like to know what can be done to make our neighborhood less apealing to investors? I've read about changing CC&R's to require buyers to live in the home for two years, unless they could prove they needed to lease it out to avoid financial hardship. My neighborhood was built in 2005 and hit hard by the housing crisis so we have a lot of rental properties. Unfortunately, homes in this neighborhood are still being advergised as "investor specials". We pay higher HOa fees than most other neighborhoods in our area, and yet ours looks awful in comparison due to the rental homes not being keppt up. Many of the investor owned homes are delinquent with their HOS fees as well. Any advice would be welcome!
Address those things you see as problems first. It would be extremely rare for the HOA rules not to have enforcement teeth in them. Until the things that make a difference are addressed they will continue. Someone needs to have the determination to enforce the rules or the deterioration will continue. Whether or not this will dissuade investors is questionable but if the problems you're complaining about are remedied it won't matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 01:39 AM
eok
 
6,684 posts, read 4,251,442 times
Reputation: 8520
It's unfair to those who pay their HOA fees on time to let others be seriously late. On-time payment of HOA fees should be strictly enforced. And if there are any blights in the common areas, the fees should be increased to do whatever it takes to resolve those problems and make the whole place nicer. But it's also very important that the money be spent wisely with strict accountability. Such as not giving contracts to friends or anything. Every homeowner should get documents of everything, including the minutes of all board meetings, all finances, all accounts, etc. Any attempt to hide any details should be addressed very strictly and openly. It's especially important that no auditors of the HOA finances be friends of any board members, as that gives the appearance of corruption.

Rental problems can be solved by strict enforcement of rules. If tenants violate rules, landlords can be required to evict them or pay fines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 04:53 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Keeping things fixed up as a community ages is an ongoing issue but a critical one in terms of owner occupancy.

It essential that HOAs have good fiscal policies in place to ensure that dues are paid in a timely manner and that these dues are used to keep the assets well maintained.

If homeowners are not paying dues and/or not keeping their properties according to the covenants they agreed to when the bought the place, then the HOA needs to deal with this.

Ultimately, the only way to keep investors at bay is to keep property values high enough that they are no longer attractive to investors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 05:00 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,221,727 times
Reputation: 18170
Quote:
Originally Posted by EngGirl View Post
Sometimes you need a majority of homeowners to agree to change rules regarding no renting for first 1-2 years, so if you have many renters now you might not get what you want.
In Florida, a rule change that restricts property use does not apply to any owner who votes against the change. If they sell, the new restrictions will apply to the new owner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:26 AM
 
Location: NC
6,032 posts, read 9,212,031 times
Reputation: 6378
In NC the HOA I have experience with had a number of horribly delinquent accounts....

They switched management companies and attorneys and instituted this

60 Days - by 60 days if you are late you have received 2-3 notices already and receive first lien warning notice
90 Days - by 90 days processing and filing of lien in progress
120 days- by 120 days foreclosure warning on perfected lien goes out
180 days- by 180 days if the lien isn't settled the HOA board can decide to follow through on foreclosure

My HOA foreclosed and owned like 8 properties last year forcing the banks to either take possession and do maintenance or allowing the HOA to rent the properties out to recoup income and maintain the properties. Worked out very nicely.

That policy has been in place now for 3 years and delinquency is WAYYYY down. If people know the neighborhood is serious, it will be the first bill they pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 06:47 AM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suncc49 View Post
In NC the HOA I have experience with had a number of horribly delinquent accounts....

They switched management companies and attorneys and instituted this

60 Days - by 60 days if you are late you have received 2-3 notices already and receive first lien warning notice
90 Days - by 90 days processing and filing of lien in progress
120 days- by 120 days foreclosure warning on perfected lien goes out
180 days- by 180 days if the lien isn't settled the HOA board can decide to follow through on foreclosure

My HOA foreclosed and owned like 8 properties last year forcing the banks to either take possession and do maintenance or allowing the HOA to rent the properties out to recoup income and maintain the properties. Worked out very nicely.

That policy has been in place now for 3 years and delinquency is WAYYYY down. If people know the neighborhood is serious, it will be the first bill they pay.
Exactly.

For years, our HOA had a number of properties where the owners collected rent but did not pay the mortgage or the dues. It was a nightmare. Once we got serious about liens and letters from the attorney, things picked up.

Banks take forever to foreclose and when they do, all the back dues and liens are lost in the foreclosure. If the HOA forecloses in a timely manner, you may have several years of rent to help cover common expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 09:55 AM
 
4,538 posts, read 6,449,583 times
Reputation: 3481
I dont think the renters and investors is the issue it is a by product of the real issues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 11:31 AM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,896,657 times
Reputation: 17353
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
Address those things you see as problems first. It would be extremely rare for the HOA rules not to have enforcement teeth in them. Until the things that make a difference are addressed they will continue. Someone needs to have the determination to enforce the rules or the deterioration will continue. Whether or not this will dissuade investors is questionable but if the problems you're complaining about are remedied it won't matter.
Exactly.

I wouldn't jump to the idea of 2 year residency right off the bat since your HOA is not really managing things properly legally as it is. That's just going to be an ineffective band aid that may leave you with a bunch of vacant units IMO. WHO is going to even buy there and live there if it's not an attractive community either visually or financially? Or more realistically...at market prices.

I'm assuming you don't have a very strong community since it is relatively new so you need to address it.

FIRST of all everyone should be being INTERVIEWED by the HOA before buying and renting. This is to reinforce the bylaws; it's not ~exactly an interview to deem them "acceptable" or whatnot. IT's subliminal.

I think if you tighten things up as everyone else reviewed, you could allow a certain amount of rentals without the residency requirement that may leave you with more empty units than you can absorb. THEN you'll all be paying more in fees for what?

While I'm not crazy about the idea of living next to renters, the unit next door is managed well by a realtor and the owners come down twice a year or so until they retire full time. I always have to educate their tenants even if they're "nice"...because YES, they do things that "we" don't do here. Like leave all their shoes and personal possessions out in the common entrance. Renters have a different mind set. And we have it in our bylaws that rental units are limited to a certain number and no short terms allowed (I think under six months). But I stipulate our HOA is in existence since 1987 and we have a management company that keeps things running well for the most part. AND an active board and community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2015, 02:53 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 6,449,583 times
Reputation: 3481
Quote:
Originally Posted by runswithscissors View Post
Exactly.

I wouldn't jump to the idea of 2 year residency right off the bat since your HOA is not really managing things properly legally as it is. That's just going to be an ineffective band aid that may leave you with a bunch of vacant units IMO. WHO is going to even buy there and live there if it's not an attractive community either visually or financially? Or more realistically...at market prices.

I'm assuming you don't have a very strong community since it is relatively new so you need to address it.

FIRST of all everyone should be being INTERVIEWED by the HOA before buying and renting. This is to reinforce the bylaws; it's not ~exactly an interview to deem them "acceptable" or whatnot. IT's subliminal.

I think if you tighten things up as everyone else reviewed, you could allow a certain amount of rentals without the residency requirement that may leave you with more empty units than you can absorb. THEN you'll all be paying more in fees for what?

While I'm not crazy about the idea of living next to renters, the unit next door is managed well by a realtor and the owners come down twice a year or so until they retire full time. I always have to educate their tenants even if they're "nice"...because YES, they do things that "we" don't do here. Like leave all their shoes and personal possessions out in the common entrance. Renters have a different mind set. And we have it in our bylaws that rental units are limited to a certain number and no short terms allowed (I think under six months). But I stipulate our HOA is in existence since 1987 and we have a management company that keeps things running well for the most part. AND an active board and community.
Renters are not the problem. It is the owners who rent are the problem if they don't do proper due diligence and make sure the tenants understand the rules the condo should be contacting them. We never ever contact or talk to tenants directly.

We have zero rules on renting, no fees, no background checks, don't even ask for the names of tenants. Guess what the majority of complex is owner occupied and 100% of our issues is with owners. Never tenants.

I would never put rules on tenants or rentals. It would hurt our resale value. Plenty of coops and fake condos with rental restrictions that folks can buy into
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top